SkyDK comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 13, chapter 81 - Less Wrong

6 Post author: bogdanb 27 March 2012 06:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1099)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SkyDK 29 March 2012 08:30:16PM *  2 points [-]

Slurs? (oh you mean "idiots"? I'd refrain from that in the future; I didn't mean to be offensive EDIT: later clarified to referring to retarded which I'll also refrain from using in the future... me not being a native speaker will end up being expensive karma-wise).

Transfiguring a whole mountain would: a) take more magical energy than most wizards could muster. b) not extract any resources.

Partial transfiguring has the distinct advantage of not having to transfigure entire objects (such as mountains). Perhaps a spell could also help with actually finding valuable resources.

Besides that partial transfiguration is an excellent break in/out spell (as seen earlier in TSPE) and I do not recall saying that Harry had to stay legal. He's shown already his ability to disregard the law (again TSPE) if he thinks it's worth it.

Comment author: arundelo 29 March 2012 09:11:53PM 2 points [-]

Slurs? (oh you mean "idiots"?

MixedNuts meant "retarded".

Comment author: SkyDK 29 March 2012 09:15:27PM -2 points [-]

... I need a slur to describe how dumb I feel now...

Comment author: pedanterrific 29 March 2012 09:33:44PM *  0 points [-]

"Slow"? Edit: or no, that's the same thing, isn't it. Um. Probably a dumb question, but what's wrong with "dumb"?

Comment author: AspiringKnitter 29 March 2012 11:16:22PM 6 points [-]

Dumb used to mean mute. Personally, I think that's going a little overboard with the political correctness, though. (And this from someone who doesn't use retarded as an insult, or even crazy.)

Comment author: Will_Newsome 29 March 2012 11:29:43PM 2 points [-]

(Basically unrelated, but: Do you or does anyone reading this know of anywhere online to read lots of case studies of schizophrenics, ideally without selection effects for "interesting" cases?)

Comment author: AspiringKnitter 29 March 2012 11:52:51PM 1 point [-]

No, but my local library has two autobiographies. Both seemed interesting to me, though.

Maybe you could look for internet support groups or forums or something. Stuff people write about themselves is probably more useful than stuff doctors write about them if you're looking to learn about their thought processes.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 29 March 2012 11:58:32PM 1 point [-]

Good suggestions, thanks much.

Comment author: Dmytry 30 March 2012 06:27:41PM 0 points [-]

Something oddly relevant that i came across recently, tendency to interpret things too literally:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17372545

It is sort of a stereotype though, so I do not know how real it is.