paper-machine comments on Rationality Quotes June 2012 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: OpenThreadGuy 02 June 2012 05:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (413)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 June 2012 04:06:34AM 1 point [-]

Isn't this the wrong question? We'd want to know what proportion of ten-state two-symbol machines with blank tapes turned out to be gods.

In so far as that's what we want, Catholicism still falls to being a huge conjunction of propositions.

Comment author: faul_sname 22 September 2012 05:29:04AM 1 point [-]

We'd want to know what proportion of ten-state two-symbol machines with blank tapes turned out to be gods.

Do we? I would think we would want to know what proportion of universes are created by ten-state two-symbol machines that are gods as opposed to ten-state two-symbol machines that are not gods.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 September 2012 03:03:13PM *  0 points [-]

That was implied by "proportion".

Comment author: private_messaging 24 June 2012 04:29:06AM *  -2 points [-]

Isn't this the wrong question? We'd want to know what proportion of ten-state two-symbol machines with blank tapes turned out to be gods.

One short god will suffice if laws of physics require substantially larger program. And for all we know they do.

edit: Also, there's only what, 20^10 = about 10 trillion possible ten state two symbol machines? Maybe 9 old British billions after you eliminate non-universal machines. That's less than the data in physical constants we haven't derived.