Benja comments on Reflection in Probabilistic Logic - Less Wrong

63 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 March 2013 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (171)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Benja 23 March 2013 06:52:34PM *  8 points [-]

Comments on the proof of Theorem 2:

I believe the entire second-to-last paragraph can be replaced by:

If there is no such , then . Thus we can take to be the complement of (which is open since is closed) and let be the entire space.

I'm thinking that the proof becomes conceptually slightly clearer if you show that the graph is closed by showing that it contains the limit of any convergent sequence, though:

Suppose for all , and . Since is closed, we have . We must show that . Thus, suppose that . Since , for all sufficiently large we have and therefore . Since , it follows that . In other words, assigns probability 1 to every element of , and hence to all of (since this set is countable).

Comment author: paulfchristiano 24 March 2013 04:53:46AM 3 points [-]

I think this is a cleaner way of saying it; I'm going to take this approach. Thanks!