= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
UnrequitedHope comments on Open thread, Jan. 26 - Feb. 1, 2015 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (431)
Tried making a blog and it wouldn't let me because "karma". Drafts can't be publicly read either so this is the best I can do.
Can we please have a feature where I can opt to instead of going through user XYZ's posts, I can just see the title and choose the one I want (or was looking for?)
So it'll be like, instead of:
XYZ's posts
[Title]
[TEXT]
[TEXT]
[TEXT]
[REPEAT]
It'll be
[TITLE WITH LINK]
[TITLE WITH LINK]
[TITLE WITH LINK]
[REPEAT AD EXHASTIUM]
Basically just like the sequences, where you have links to the posts themselves rather than the whole damn thing in one page.
And in the case of blogs, make it so that once you have 20 positive karma regardless of your negative karma. I guess you can sharpen this better than me because I'm probably not going to make a serious post (or one that will be taken seriously) ever In the case of drafts, make them unlisted and simply let people the ability to link to their own draft and let other view and comment on it.
That does seem like an interesting feature! There are resources for making changes to the LW codebase, which are much more likely to result in an actual change than submitting a feature request.
Interesting isn't the correct way to describe it - it's simply functional, and in terms of bandwidth, more economical. Serves the machine and the people. Give your AI a shot of that!
I could honestly try to implement it but I'm not sure I have the right skills to make it work beautifully - I place an emphasis on a job-well-done and I feel like I'd just make the site worse overall than someone who does have the technical aptitude to actually implement it.
I hate being the UX guy and hope I could get better in this year.
A honest question - has nobody ever thought of this before? Heh. Optimize everything except the site you learned rationality from? MIRI could make an AI paper about that!
EDIT: I will do this anyway - a wise person who's also a programmer told me that if you have the right mindset interesting problems will find you so I'm definitely going to pull some hair in an attempt to do it. I just hope I'm not going to run into licensing issues, I'm going to release my heck of a hack in a freedom-respecting license, so if there's a problem, I'll just say Reddit sucks.
There are opportunity costs. Given the amount of traffic that LW has claiming that a certain new feature would be economical is a strong claim. It means that the resources wouldn't be spent elsewhere with a higher return.
I have no numbers but I do wonder how many titles we can put in comparison to a title and text of an average post.
Also, if you want another thing, I noticed the recent comments section only displays the beginning of it, while containing the whole comment that's practically inaccessible.
I've no practical experience but in theory couldn't they only display x characters instead of the whole string?