I think it's worth reading this if you think it's some variety of a clear cut case.
It's not worth reading that, unless you're interested in a case study in deceptive reporting.
The case is extremely clear-cut. The major US media often got minor details wrong (especially details having to do with how the Italian legal system works), but seldom did they get the important evidence wrong. Their "one-sided presentation" was accurate.
By contrast, the linked article completely distorts the evidence. It reads like the stuff you read at pro-guilt hate...
Here are the New York Times, CNN, and NBC. Here is Wikipedia for background.
The case has made several appearances on LessWrong; examples include: