Ah, another lie from you combined with a masterful use of Dark Arts. You state here that:

I used an openly hostile attack because it meant the weight of evidence was on -your- side

However, in your previous comments, you clearly acknowledged that you used an openly hostile attack because it meant that the weight of evidence would be on the side of the person making the attack - you. Indeed, using an openly hostile attack anchors the "weight of public opinion" in your own words, on the side of the one making the attack. It primes the reader to agree, as we intuitively emotionally agree with the things we first come across, and have to use System 2 to force ourselves to disagree. So please avoid lying in the future. You're really not doing yourself any favors by your blatant lies.