= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ChristianKl comments on Open Thread, January 4-10, 2016 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (430)
By replying you eliminated his ability to delete the post and thus maybe the point of the effort.
Can't he still replace it with [deleted] or something? (If so, and if it is helpful, I will happily amend what I wrote to leak less information about what happened.) Anyway: of course it was not my intention to deanonymize anyone, and I regret it if I have.
I think that's only happens when he would delete his own account.
I don't think that's the case but if he wants to create a annonymous account he likely should start over with a new one.
I meant replacing the content with "[deleted]", not the account name.
I think from the context of your post the meaning would still have been clear. Apart from that I don't think he can do it after he retracked the post. (the strikethrough)
Nope, I can still edit it.