Error comments on Turning the Technical Crank - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Error 05 April 2016 05:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (134)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Error 05 April 2016 06:49:26PM 3 points [-]

Agreed that it's inconvenient. Rather than separate it I'll cut it down. 2, 4, and 6 all collapse to "client feature sets differ"; this is a meta-feature, not a meta-bug. The downside of client control is that not everybody sees the same thing. The upside of client control is client competition, which has similar benefits to market competition.

Solving adoption is the point of section 2 and is too long to describe here. Note that, as mentioned, I do not actually expect this to be adopted. The world isn't that kind.

3 is a legitimate problem and will be addressed, but it's the sort of thing where I need to spin up INN and see how it actually behaves when presented with edit-style supersedes. If there is a weak point in my "this is possible" argument, this is it.

Comment author: DanArmak 05 April 2016 07:09:27PM 2 points [-]

2, 4, and 6 all collapse to "client feature sets differ"; this is a meta-feature, not a meta-bug.

That misses my point. Some features, like voting, can't be implemented as clientside features, because clients would need to communicate about them (and establish consensus).