Lumifer comments on Turning the Technical Crank - Less Wrong

43 Post author: Error 05 April 2016 05:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (134)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 07 April 2016 04:53:18PM 1 point [-]

Where we're failing is in attracting interesting deep thoughts from people willing to expand and discuss those thoughts here.

Yep. That is THE problem that LW has to solve.

Notice how it doesn't care about which protocols are used to shuffle which bits back and forth.

Comment author: Viliam 08 April 2016 10:28:55AM *  3 points [-]

Protocols have an impact on discussion, and discussion has an impact on what articles people write.

Otherwise, Eliezer could have posted his Sequences on 4chan.

Comment author: Lumifer 08 April 2016 02:32:54PM 1 point [-]

Protocols have an impact on discussion

Not protocols. High-level structure of a BBS/mailing list/forum/Twitter/etc. Protocols (in the technical sense) provide some constraints on what kind of structures can be built on their basis, but there are enough degrees of freedom to construct very different things on top of the same protocols.

Otherwise, Eliezer could have posted his Sequences on 4chan.

So the difference between LW and 4chan is protocols..? X-)

Comment author: Dagon 07 April 2016 08:05:02PM 1 point [-]

And now that I actually write it down and compare it to previous online communities (including a few mixed online/offline) I've been part of and loved, and which have universally followed the same pattern of growth, overgrowth, loss of some driving valuable members without obvious replacement, slow decay into irrelevance (to me; at least 2 of them are going strong, just with a different feel than when I was involved)), I'm pretty pessimistic.

I'm going to put some effort into being OK with LW as it is, enjoying the parts I enjoy and being willing to follow those parts I'm missing to their new homes.

Comment author: Error 08 April 2016 12:24:11AM 3 points [-]

This fits my own prior experience of the life cycle of a community -- but when my previous community failed, a fragment of it broke off and rebuilt itself in a few form. That fragment still exists as a coherent tribe more than a decade later, and I still love it even if I disagree with certain, uh, technical decisions surrounding the splintering process.

So it's not impossible.

Comment author: Dagon 08 April 2016 03:52:36AM 2 points [-]

Oh, indeed - fragments or even whole (slightly altered) communities live on. Two of my prior identity-tied groups are still meeting and going strong, they're just not producing original research or even super-deep discussions on their topics. I still have fond feelings toward them, but I don't participate enough to consider them part of my identity.

This is primarily a reminder to myself that this is okay. I can enjoy LW for what it is rather than lamenting what it was.