= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
DanArmak comments on Open thread, Oct. 10 - Oct. 16, 2016 - All
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (147)
Or possibly they are accurate measurements of the rates of Facebook use among these two groups. Maybe it's a good thing if people who are concerned about existential risk do serious things about it instead of participating in a Facebook group.
The success of a Facebook group depends a lot on how it get's promoted and whether there are a few people who care about creating content for it.
Is the 'success' of a group its number of members, regardless of actual activity?
I don't think I would need to define it that way for the above comment to be coherent.
Of course not. Then you meant simply the success of the goals of the group's creators?
I think my sentence is true with both definitions of
success.