You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on [SEQ RERUN] Pascal's Mugging: Tiny Probabilities of Vast Utilities - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: MinibearRex 01 October 2011 02:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: shminux 01 October 2011 05:21:37AM -1 points [-]

Physicists deal with this issue daily, and they invented renormalization and cutoff techniques to make divergent things converge. This has been discussed before, not sure why it won't work.

Comment author: DanielLC 01 October 2011 09:10:48PM 2 points [-]

I don't think physicists actually have the right answer when they do that. You can use Feynman path integrals for quantum physics, and it will get the right answer if you cheat like that, but I'd bet that it's actually more related to linear equations, which don't require cheating.

Physicists use renormalization and cutoff techniques. The universe doesn't.

Also, Pascal's mugging seems to be looking at a special case where it does converge. If you actually used Solomonoff induction, it wouldn't converge because of the possibility of this sort of thing, whether or not someone ever actually makes a threat.