You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam_Bur comments on Fallacies of reification - the placebo effect - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: Morendil 13 September 2012 07:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 14 September 2012 07:17:00AM 0 points [-]

Do I understand it correctly that if small dozes of sugar could make a measurable change in nasal secretions, immune response, number of sneezes, etc., then the premise of this article would be wrong?

Or would you have an ad-hoc explanation e.g. that the patient is suppressing the sneezes to avoid social embarrassment? If yes, where exactly is the line between measurable things that patient can do for social reasons, and things that patient cannot do for social reasons? I think understanding this boundary could be useful (for example we would know which illness can be treated by social means and which can not).

Comment author: Morendil 14 September 2012 07:23:39AM 2 points [-]

Yes, the distinction I'm drawing is between outcome measures that reflect voluntary behaviours (which can therefore be strongly influenced by expectations and so on) and involuntary physiological responses.