You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Metus comments on Open thread, 21-27 April 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Metus 21 April 2014 10:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (346)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Metus 21 April 2014 08:55:48PM 4 points [-]

Something that keeps nagging me in my mind: A young college graduate comes up to you and asks "Where should I look for what kind of work to have the highest living standard?"

Remember, a lower nominal wage in a country where this wage has higher purchasing power should be better suited to this individual. Naively I might say the US or Switzerland but something tells me I am overlooking a gigantic hole.

Comment author: Dagon 21 April 2014 11:39:35PM 9 points [-]

For someone skilled enough to choose your location and who thinks long-term enough to live very cheaply for a number of years, higher nominal wages means higher absolute savings amounts.

Live somewhere expensive when you're getting started, and move somewhere cheap when you're slowing down.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 23 April 2014 12:27:47AM 2 points [-]

Cost of living is an overblown statistic because dumb people spend their money poorly. You can live in expensive areas on the cheap without that much effort. This isn't to say that living in the bay area isn't more expensive than many other areas, but it certainly isn't as expensive as the cost of living calculations would make it seem.

Comment author: Lumifer 23 April 2014 12:43:32AM 3 points [-]

You can live in expensive areas on the cheap without that much effort.

Yes, provided you're young, healthy, and childless.

Comment author: Vulture 23 April 2014 06:38:44PM 1 point [-]

young, healthy, and childless

What makes youth a necessary condition independent of overall health?

Comment author: Lumifer 23 April 2014 07:17:04PM *  2 points [-]

Mostly risk and stress tolerance.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 24 April 2014 06:28:00AM 1 point [-]

...but also less established social ties. And less settled long-term investments (though this correlates with with risk part).

Comment author: drethelin 23 April 2014 03:30:11AM 1 point [-]

Living standard as quantified is not particularly helpful to the individual. Someone might be comparatively far better off living in malaysia with a long-distance high paying freelance programming job, but I think you'll find that being around cultural compatriots is not to be ignored.

Comment author: mare-of-night 22 April 2014 01:41:20PM 1 point [-]

In some fields, doing freelance work for clients in a country with low purchasing power while living in one with high purchasing power is an option.