You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open thread, 21-27 April 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Metus 21 April 2014 10:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (346)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 25 April 2014 05:20:09PM 2 points [-]

So then the Cassandra's world is essentially a predetermined world where fate rules and you can't change anything. None of your choices matter.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 26 April 2014 01:06:42AM 1 point [-]

Alternately, in such a world, it could be that improving your predictive capacity necessarily decreases your ability to achieve your goals.

Hence the classical example of Cassandra, who was given the power of foretelling the future, but with the curse that nobody would ever believe her. To paraphrase Aladdin's genie: "Phenomenal cosmic predictive capacity ... itty bitty evidential status."

Yes, a Zelazny or Smullyan character could find ways to subvert the curse, depending on just how literal-minded Apollo's "install prophecy" code was. If Cassandra took a lesson in lying from Epimenides, she mightn't have had any problems.