You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Open thread, Jan. 26 - Feb. 1, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Gondolinian 26 January 2015 12:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (431)
Tags: open_thread

Comments (431)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 27 January 2015 11:31:53PM 1 point [-]

Fair enough. The idea of calling QM 'frequentist' really stretches the reason for using that term under anything but an explicit collapse interpretation. Maybe it would be more of a third way -

  • Frequentism would be that the world is itself stochastic.
  • Fractionism would be that the world takes both paths and we will find ourselves in one.
  • Bayes gets to keep its definition.
Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit