You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ciphergoth comments on Open Thread, Jul. 13 - Jul. 19, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: MrMind 13 July 2015 06:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (297)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ciphergoth 19 July 2015 09:57:54AM 1 point [-]

Could someone be kind enough to share the text of Stuart Russell's interview with Science here?

Fears of an AI pioneer
John Bohannon
Science 17 July 2015: Vol. 349 no. 6245 pp. 252
DOI:10.1126/science.349.6245.252
<http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6245/252.full>

Quoted here

From the beginning, the primary interest in nuclear technology was the "inexhaustible supply of energy". The possibility of weapons was also obvious. I think there is a reasonable analogy between unlimited amounts of energy and unlimited amounts of intelligence. Both seem wonderful until one thinks of the possible risks. In neither case will anyone regulate the mathematics. The regulation of nuclear weapons deals with objects and materials, whereas with AI it will be a bewildering variety of software that we cannot yet describe. I'm not aware of any large movement calling for regulation either inside or outside AI, because we don't know how to write such regulation.

Comment author: mindbound 19 July 2015 10:38:18AM 4 points [-]
Comment author: ciphergoth 19 July 2015 10:45:01AM 1 point [-]

Superb, thanks! Did you create this, or is there a way I could have found this for myself? Cheers :)

Comment author: mindbound 19 July 2015 10:59:40AM 1 point [-]

Message sent.