You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

IlyaShpitser comments on Open Thread, January 4-10, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: polymathwannabe 04 January 2016 01:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (430)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 05 January 2016 09:31:45PM 1 point [-]

A lot of value was taken by force, but economic inequality was very low.

I am contesting this.

Comment author: Lumifer 05 January 2016 09:46:39PM 1 point [-]

The first part, or the second, or both?

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 05 January 2016 09:50:00PM 0 points [-]

Second.

Comment author: Lumifer 05 January 2016 10:10:49PM *  1 point [-]

To get a bit more concrete I'm talking about the Soviet Russia of the pre-perestroika era, basically Brezhnev times.

Do you have something specific in mind? Of course party bosses lived better than village peons, but I don't think that the economic inequality was high. Money wasn't the preferred currency in the USSR -- it was power (and access).