You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Clarity comments on Open thread, Feb. 01 - Feb. 07, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: MrMind 01 February 2016 08:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (177)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clarity 07 February 2016 08:44:51AM *  0 points [-]

Excellent! I hope there's more along this line that you can post early in next week's thread. Late week posts tend to get ignored.

Highlights in the full article:

We experimented with using topic models [3] to find topics that are the most malleable (topic: food, eat, eating, thing, meat and topic: read, book, lot, books, women), and the most resistant (topic: government, state, world, country, countries and topic: sex, women, fat, person, weight). However, topic model based features do not seem to bring predictive power to either of the tasks

Limitations to non-computational application:

The study doesn't really try to, in the author's words: 'Attempt* to capture high-level linguistic properties'