You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

morganism comments on Open thread, June 27 - July 3, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Clarity 27 June 2016 01:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (79)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: morganism 03 July 2016 10:01:36PM 0 points [-]

I didn't realize that the biggest supporter of UBI in the US is the ex-leader of the Service Employees Union. Guess i will have to read that book next. Have Agars 'Humanities End' to tackle next..

http://www.alternet.org/economy/universal-basic-income-solves-robots-taking-jobs

and a write-up on why the elites don't get the Brexit drama right..

http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-06-24/-citizens-of-the-world-nice-thought-but

Comment author: MrMind 04 July 2016 08:10:45AM 0 points [-]

They failed, because as the blogger Epicurean Dealmaker pointed out on Twitter, “Markets distill the biases, opinions, & convictions of elites,” which makes them “Structurally less able to predict populist movements.”

That seems to be way off. Prediction markets reflects the opinion of those who enter in the market. AFAIK there's no barrier to the lower income strata of the popoluation. Polls also failed to predict the result, so I would say that it was not a structural failure of the markets.

Comment author: Lumifer 06 July 2016 02:47:52PM 1 point [-]

Prediction markets reflects the opinion of those who enter in the market. AFAIK there's no barrier to the lower income strata of the popoluation.

The thing is, the markets reflect committed-capital-weighted opinions of market participants. This is not an egalitarian democracy.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 July 2016 08:32:37AM 0 points [-]

Given that market participants insure against risks with the prediction market and the event of the Brexit does carry risk to some businesses I'm not sure that's empircally the case.

Comment author: MrMind 07 July 2016 07:14:13AM 0 points [-]

Possibly we (meaning I vs Epicurean Dealmaker) have a very different notion of 'elite'.
I imagine the elite as the 10% (or 5% or 1%, depending on your Pareto distribution) which has enough capital to hedge against market fluctuations (or enough to create it entirely); as far as I understand instead ED means as 'elite' anyone who has enough money to invest in a market.

Comment author: Lumifer 07 July 2016 02:26:10PM 1 point [-]

I don't think this is the issue. If you invest $10m into some market position, your "opinion" literally has one million times the impact of someone who invested $10. It's not just "people who invest" vs "people who do not invest". Even among those who invest, the more capital you apply, the more your opinion matters.

Markets are inherently capital-weighted and their opinion necessarily reflects the positions of the rich to a much greater degree.