You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

moridinamael comments on Open Thread, Aug. 8 - Aug 14. 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Elo 07 August 2016 11:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: moridinamael 12 August 2016 10:11:39PM 0 points [-]

After thinking about it I realized that the system I'm using doesn't have zero structure, but it has less than, say, multiplication tables.

I use the phonetic two digit Person-Action-Object system. So 23 for example corresponds to "Nemo nomming (a) gnome." (n=2 and m=3). 48 is "Raph raving (at a) ref." (r=4, f/v=8). 56 is "Luigi leashing a leach." (5=l, 6=sh/j/ch). This allows you to chunk 234856 as the vivid image "Nemo raving at a leach."

I'm still not quick enough with the system to say whether it's really useful. Part of the purpose of the exercise is to force myself to memorize something difficult just for the sake of getting a sense of what it is to memorize something, since I've avoided that activity for my entire life.

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 August 2016 10:19:41AM 0 points [-]

At the moment I do have people and soon I will have cards for all from 0 to 99. I don't yet have actions or objects. How did you come up with lists for actions and objects?

Comment author: moridinamael 15 August 2016 04:30:44PM *  0 points [-]

I started with this list and customized it with names that had meaning for me.

This page ( http://mt.artofmemory.com/wiki/Person-Action-Object_(PAO)_System ) has a lot of links that could give you other ideas.