You are defending irrationality. It filters out the one thing it needs to not filter out. A better solution would be to eliminate it.

I wonder what my failure in communicating my idea is in this case. Let me rephrase my argument in favor of filtering and see if I can get my point across: if we eliminated the filter, the site would be inundated with spam and fake accounts posts. By having a filter we block all this, and people willing to pass a small threshold will not be denied to post their contributions.

Sigh, I guess we never will address Ideal Money will we

In due time, I will.

I've already spent all day with like 10 posters, that refuse to do anything but attack my character.

That is unfortunate, but you must be prepared to make these discussions on the lon run. There are people that come here only once a week or only once every three months. A day can be enough to filter out the most visceral reactions, but here discussions can span days, weeks or years.

Its John Nash, and he spent his life on this proposal, ya'll won't even read it.

I am reading it right now, and exactly because it's Nash I'm reading as careful as I can.

But what won't fly here is insulting. Frustration for not being able to communicate your idea is something that we all felt, after all communicating clearly is hard. But if you let yourself below a certain standard of respect, you will be moderated and possibly even banned. That would allow you to communicate your idea even less.