All of LizzardWizzard's Comments + Replies

I promise to take care of my rationality skills when the work is done

Thank You! You are my hero, tho I'm not your princess

oops seems like I misclicked, this was off course a reply to Clarity

mate thank your for your help, I hope interpals would work out there for me, The thing is I don't want to go meta on this, it's just a reminder for myself and that's it, it wasn't designed as a solution for something else

-1LizzardWizzard
oops seems like I misclicked, this was off course a reply to Clarity
2polymathwannabe
Japanese ideograms are not the same as 'hieroglyphics,' but here is your sentence: 強くなりたい

I want to have 'tsuyoku naritai' tattoo and wondering how it should be written properly on hieroglyphic

2[anonymous]
the irony. Don't mourn any change of decision here. a structured approach to help you think through problems and solutions in a logical way. There are six basic steps You may find that getting a tattoo with 'tsuyoku naritai' isn't your solution.

sorry, not sure if this should be posted here, but I hadn't yet found more rational strategy for my problem. If any of you guys know someone who can speak and write Japanese please contact me, I would very appreciate any help

0Crux
What are you trying to do? If a Japanese person with passable English would be able to help, then head on over to a language-exchange website such as InterPals and trade English instruction for whatever you need. If you need someone who speaks high-level English and it's okay if their Japanese is only passable, then go to a forum such as Koohii and make your request to the large population of people learning Japanese. If you need someone high level in both languages, well, you'll have a harder time. Such people are uncommon and not likely to work for free.

Based on what I have just read you have nothing to worry about

Good point. However most of her opinions seem to be unfalsifiable, like how I can tell if Dao technic of Inner Smile doesn't work, maybe I'm smiling to my organs not sincerely enough

2ChristianKl
The point isn't to try to falsify her opinions but to generally encourage her to make predictions about reality and make predictions about reality as well. If you look at the Dao technic of Inner Smile, you might start by asking her whether she thinks herself that she can perceive whether or not she's sincerely doing the technique. Don't get attached to have a debate about truth of individual beliefs but focus on actually making predictions.

This topic is valuable me. Every time when me and my girlfriend getting involved in argument it ends up badly and we continue on holding prior beliefs. She blames me for being too rational (In hollywood sense obv, none of my efforts to convince that the word has different meaning payed off). She is absolutely sure that when you hold a skeptical position, you are getting trapped into it, so entry gate for outside view is closed and you are limiting the spectrum of possibilities. With this I'm okay because I like to think of myself as an open-minded person a... (read more)

2ChristianKl
There no reason to think that trying harder would produce bigger effects. If your goal is convincing it's very important to pick your battles. I had a disagreement with my girlfriend about the health effects of the microwave. She thinks that feeding a plant only microwaved water will kill it. That happens to be a quite testable belief and we might run the experiment even if I don't believe that it will produce additional knowledge for me. You could check whether her beliefs make predictions about the real world and then do credence calibration games with her. You train the important rationalist skill of predicting and she might find out that some of her beliefs don't make true predictions.

There are some kind of forecasting tournaments provided by Phillip Tetlock mainly associated with politics issues, however I've found no info on how to enter one. Here is a short introductory course

In my opinion prediction markets are still very raw concept which doesn't grow and spread very well in its current form and needs capital transformation

2Douglas_Knight
The web page is here. In previous years they recruited new participants about this time of year, but they don't seem to be doing so this year. They are transitioning off of IARPA funding and much of the page is broken. This was one of many competitors in the IARPA competition. I didn't include them because their predictions were not public. They couldn't be public, because the whole point was to compare their results. Except Scicast, because it wasn't predicting the same things. Even if you joined GJP, you probably only got aggregated predictions across your team, and maybe not even that.

I think it is a very bad idea. Can't imagine how rational sex would looks like. After all looking back at your life you will be asking a question I lived a life or I had existed

2Lumifer
That's because you're thinking of Straw Vulcans.

Still makes me smile as I remember the context and nerdy philosophy professor. Hyperbolic but it doesn't make it any worse

The idea to combine happiness guide with rationality techniques and popularizing science seems appealing to me. Unfortunately video is not available for watching in my region. The book content I suppose have to be very introductory and written in friendly language opposing to "from ai to zombies" for example. Where I can see some of your previous publications? And why you want to crowdfund an actual hardcover book and not distribute it through Amazon e-books?

2Gleb_Tsipursky
Here's an earlier post with a link to a draft copy of the workbook, which includes a number of citations of my earlier work on this topic. As you'll see, it's couched in friendly language. The crowdfunding campaign page, linked above, explains in more depth the reasoning for the crowdfunding campaign.

Also don't forget to introduce the biases and give some kind of shining example of fallacy. Maybe you should have an actor in the hall, or you just go with an improvisation of course. I mean asking someone from the audience about whether Linda seems to be more a bank-teller or a bank-teller and a feminist and similar stuff. With your 'raising awareness' goal it would be halfway if someone says oops

Liron Shapiro gave an introductory talk to kids about epistemic rationality, if I remember correctly.

Why you don't like to include ageless "Politics is a mind-killer" fable? This is I beleive part of the reason why rationale keeps failing in our world and views remain one-sided

BTW, gl mate!

0efim
Thank you for the link, I'll look it through! "Politics is a mind-killer" is a great idea for an opening! I didn't think about it at first, Robin Hanson is interview for "Conversations from the Pale Blue Dot" (http://commonsenseatheism.com/?p=1911 number 67) describes the core point very in a very short and meaningful way.

I can understand the compass part, it can be very useful and save your life onetime, but time-sense? For what the heck you might need this? In peoples world people wear watches or have timers on their smartphones, and in the world there's no people there's no time

1TezlaKoil
In my case, the answer is simple: tutoring, teaching and lecturing. The feedback of watches and timers is completely inadequate: I can't "profile", I can't adjust my tempo in real time, et c. Not to say that I prefer to have this information subconsciously. The information from the compass anklet was far more useful (and efficient) than glancing at my smartphone's compass every second would have been.

Have you got an idea how to test this, without actually raising or destroying the rock? Or maybe you got some other piece of Buddha's hair in your grandma's cellar? Impermanence is the only permanent thing I guess btw it might not be helpful; And you are obviously right about that it is only the center of the mass that matters

I had an arguement with my gilfriend about how on earth golden rock doesn't drop over an edge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyaiktiyo_Pagoda)

I said there must be scientific explanation of course, that the rock is somehow heavier on the opposite side of the cliff, and that the monks probably knew some math, or just picked up this one trick from unknown piligrim

And she continues to argue that this is magic and it is the legendary Buddha's hair that prevent the Stone from falling...

2Lumifer
Show her some pictures
0JoshuaZ
Have you asked her how to test if there is such a hair? Why she favors that hypothesis? Does she think this is magic? Restricted to the premise that some form of Buddhism is correct, how would it fit with the idea that everything is impermanent that Buddha would have a magic hair that delays inevitable falls? I'm not even sure one needs anything as complicated as being heavier on one side, even if the rock were uniform the center of mass would be above the cliff.

But when it comes to messy gene expression networks, we've already found the hidden beauty - the stable level of underlying physics. Because we've already found the master order, we can guess that we won't find any additional secret patterns that will make biology as easy as a sequence of cubes. Knowing the rules of the game, we know that the game is hard. We don't have enough computing power to do protein chemistry from physics (the second source of uncertainty) and evolutionary pathways may have gone different ways on different planets (the third so

... (read more)

But quirell knows that Harry possesses the power which kills dementors, so it can't be related to prophecy from his perspective

7Rob Bensinger
'"he has power the Dark Lord knows not" could mean that the Dark Lord doesn't know that the power exists, or it could mean the Dark Lord doesn't know how to use the power. The prophecy didn't say 'he has power the Dark Lord knows not of.'

Thank you for reminder, I'm done with procrastinating for today

-1helltank
No problem, and I hope this post taught you how to work better and learn better. If you have problems with procrastination, you can try programs like Beeminder, or simply have a friend act as a watcher to ensure you get your work(or your three new things) done for the day, week or month.

It seems that it not so easy to purchase bitcoins in Russia. If you have any reccomendations please contact me

My choice of words was incorrect. i meant "more likely" to agree and to succeed at surviving

I'd be very interested in a story that goes into detail about the Cyprus experiment (fill an island with all "alphas", instead of the usual "alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon" distribution, and see what happens) from Brave New World. Better yet, fill an island with all "rationalists" and see what happens.

2 rationalists must come to agreement if they are truly rational, so they have great chances of survival, whereas "all alphas" will never succeed at dividing their responsibilities and all will end up doing the s... (read more)

6Lumifer
No, they must not. The "common priors" requirement is not viable practically.

I doubt that the experimenters themselves wrote the article. Someone has to popularize science to mere humans

0[anonymous]
The experimenters never write the popular articles. I've learned not to attack the messenger (too much).
0Viliam_Bur
And it can be printed, if someone insists on a book form.

I don't like design and usability of the site. I think topics should be somehow divided, because not everyone is interested in soccer or currencies which are the most trivial things to predict

Maybe we should ask children more of these grande questions and gain factual answers instead of taking them as deeper as they are.

Indeed, I suppose their worldview are much clearer and in some ways unbiased than ours. When child is born he sees the world as it is, not through many prisms including our subjective value judgements

I guess you are confusing our universe with parallel worlds. It is very doubtful that there is a planet with the same geography and processes of evolution that completely replicated ours (even giving that evolution on Earth is the only way for life to emerge) so that there are ET humans who named one of their countries USA. So it is obvious that no one up there could share completely same experiences with us

1James_Miller
If the many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics is true then there are lots of universes really, really similar to ours.
Sarunas100

I wonder is this because most humans can't find joy in the merely real, praising deities and trusting in other supernatural stuff like signs and horoscopes, so disbelieving and living in reality is abnormal?

Well, there is a group of people who are SlateStarCodex readers, but aren't LessWrong readers. Some of them say that they do not find LessWrong topics interesting, they are often too speculative for them, and they prefer SSC because they want to discuss things like policy and economics. I think that this explanation is applicable in general case as ... (read more)

I wonder is this because most humans can't find joy in the merely real, praising deities and trusting in other supernatural stuff like signs and horoscopes, so disbelieving and living in reality is abnormal?

or more prosaically, because the sequences are written in an idiosyncratic semi-autobiographical style with few citations and often grandiose language, and many people are immediately turned off by that

in a Pickwickian sense everybody does, only their payoffs varies

Em..change in policy I suppose, isn't all this protest business about it?

6Lumifer
Which "change in policy" do Eric Garner protests aim to achieve? A rewriting of how indictment or grand juries work? Which "change in policy" did Occupy aim to achieve?

Here's an example of what Doug Hofstadter writes in I Am A Strange Loop. Kurt Goedel discovered that Principia Mathematica by Bertrand Russell does provide reference to itself. So Russell in his book yields the propositions and their proofs, and then Goedel assigns specific numbers to proofs and therefore proves that there is a proof that they are in fact, provable

You forgot that an adjective хуевый means bad, for example instead of saying "I am feeling sick" u say мне хуево, but as parent points it out, the adjective formed from the same root "охуительный" means exactly the contrary - мне охуительно is the russian equivalent of "I am super fine"

As you can see it is quite complicated, but even people who never went to school are the great masters of the skill

0[anonymous]
Хуевый is not derived from (о)хуеть, but directly from хуй. It has nothing to do with the word in question.

I would argue with you, if someday I ever happen to write fanfiction named something like HP and the Methods of Russian Profanity as you put it, there would be prophecy suggesting "and he has the power of which the other does not know"

0timujin
I would be delighted to read it. Please, do happen to write it.

Yep, doesn't it sound awesome (or охуительно?) Your masters will be all kinds of rednecks, prisoners and other honorable authorities of the craftsmanship

ahahaahahahaha as a native russian speaker I can say for sure that u can define ANY concept just by slightly transforming words derived from "penis" or "cunt". There is almost infinite set of variations, each having particular meaning; u have no choice rather than to beleive me or dedicate lifetime into learning Russian filthy language

0timujin
As another native Russian speaker, I can say that Russian profanity is indeed powerful, but is not as precise as the parent post puts it.
0gjm
That sounds like quite an enjoyable lifetime, actually.

In same vein, no word for "challenge" that doesn't also mean "ordeal". The distinction seems to be also missing from Russian brains, a very peculiar phenomenon that Russian culturologists are always upset about.

to paraphrase, what is the meaning of challenge except "вызов" or "испытание"

1timujin
There is no extra meaning in "challenge". "Вызов" and "испытание" cover the English word "challenge" more or less completely. The problem is that they also accidentally cover the English word "ordeal" as well. Challenge is not something bad or painful, but ordeal is. When you say you want "испытание", you can potentially be understood as "I want more pain in my life", which is not what English "I want a challenge" means.

I suppose that the problem emerged only because you communicate only with people of your sort and level of awareness, try to go on a trip to some rural village or start conversations with taxists, dishwashers, janitors, cooks, security guards etc.

Really fascinating! But my russian brains can't grasp this one thing, could you please at least try to explain what is this mysterious additional meaning of the word 'challenge' that can't be translated into Russian, and doesn't mean "summon to contest" or "high degree of difficulty"

1timujin
I have some trouble understanding what you want. Try to rephrase, or expand.

Finally I mastered the skill) The trick was to put effort and make you sys2 to come up with a stories and then decode them into numbers again. I don't have deep mathematical and programming understanding like most of people here, so I had to use word almost time after time, for example "727" is almost Boeing 737

You made up this stories in a minute? Wow, fast system 1

2Gunnar_Zarncke
There is not that much to make up. For me numbers (digit sequences) are somewhat like words. And building a story from words is mostly easy - compare to this xkcd. Compare this: * 286 718 3385 246 354 65 625 * cpu my-friend symmetric-hill stairs broken-stairs earning 5-squares. The latter is not exactly how I read the digits but close enough to get an impression I hope. Constructing a story for the latter is easier than for the 'meaningless' digits themselves. I guess it must be the same or rather much deeper for many mathematicians, esp. the number-theory ones. It was said about Ramanujan that every positive integer was one his personal friends.

Yeah I understand what are you talking about, such patterns can be found in many random numbers, but sometimes there's nothing to hook, numbers don't repeat, ascend or descend in vivid order. In this case we move to the next level where "non-storiness" becomes the memorable feature?

2Gunnar_Zarncke
Let me tell you the 'story' behind the number I memorized: 286718338524635465625 (actually 21 digits which I got by something like 12345^5) What is the pattern or story? I grouped it as follows (the grouping is no fixed step, it happens as the 'story' unfolds): 286 718 3385 246 354 65 625 * 286 is an old intel CPU * 7 is the lucky number of a friend (which incidentally has lots of old PCs possibly with 286s even) * 7+1 is 8 (which is my lucky number thus connecting us, his birthday is also very close to mine) * 33 is a double which stands out and 8 is the sum of the neighboring 3 and 5. * 246 35 are +2 stepped interleaved runs. The last 4 is between 3 and 5. * 65 was my hourly rate. * 625 is 5^4 a quite memorable number and just adds a 2 between the 65 before (thus backward connecting it). In this case there is not much story but the patterns are memorable enough even without a real story,

Did u use any special mnemonic technique? Or you succeded just because of continiual repetition?

Do you memorize digits by groups of 2 or 3, or it depends on a context of actual output number?

2Alex_Miller
I will repeat part of the number out loud and memorize another part of the number. Then, when I recall it, I string the two together.
1Gunnar_Zarncke
I find patterns in the numbers. Even quite long sequences are like 'names' which I can connect to draw a story from. I know of the major system but it doesn't work very well for me. My imagination is of the non-visual and abstract kind and thus the vivid imagination required costs more than it gains (for me).

Probably your current reality map should be updated, try taking some other views on the situation, and don't forget that yourself being the center of the universe is nothing but an unavoidable illusion. Watching some films about cosmos often reminds me how miserable my own problems are) Also the best psychotherapist I can offer is Mr. Weedman - he can give you valuable insights about your own cognition and thinking and it won't cost very much.

Oh, and after dark there always comes light, you might be skeptical about this at the moment, but when you'll see it for yourself I hope you smile

Oh thanks, now I see it, these almost-there cases looking somewhat holywoodish, like the villain obligatory should pronounce lingering monologue before actually killing his victim, and thanks God hero appears in last moment.

Okay, Skynet which won't instantly get rid of humanity is improbable, if really superintelligent, and if it has this goal.

We can easily imagine many kinds of possible catastrophe which can happen, but we are not equally good at producing heavenlike utopian views, but this is an evidence only about our lack of imagination

Yeah I was talking about that terminator guy in terms that AI got ultimate control and used its power against humans, but was defeated, it is not obligatory to include here cyborgs time-travellers.

How you do measure, besides your gut feelings, realisticness of these kinds of scenarios? There is no way to assign probabilities accurately, all we can and should do is imagine as much consequences as possible

1ChristianKl
Ultimate control and getting defeated don't mesh well. In Hollywood there a chance that an AGI that gets ultimate control gets afterwards defeated. In the real world not so much. Analysis in multiple different ways. Keeping up with the the discourse. That's debatable. You can always use Bayesian reasoning but it's not the main issue of this debate.

Unfortunately our brains lack capacity of thinking about superior intelligence. As I understood you want to describe particular examples of what lies between scenarios 0 (stands for human extinction) and 1 (mutual cooperation and new better level of everything)

First, there are scenarios where human race is standing on the edge of extinction, but somehow ables to fight back and surive, call that Skynet scenario. Analogously, you can think of a scenario where emergence of FAI don't do any great harm, but also don't provide too much new insights and never really get far beyond Human-level intelligence

-1ChristianKl
Skynet is no realistic scenario.
Load More