It's certainly borderline, in that it is not typical of posts on LessWrong. Absence of similar posts is at least moderate evidence that such posts genuinely do not belong, which is why I proceeded carefully (title, content warning, checking in with LW leadership rather than just assuming it was fine).
But assuming that you are actually asking, and that the question above is not rhetorical:
Strong claims that it is not appropriate (which you did not make; I'm just mentioning them here because it seems relevant) would have to ground out somewhere, and since this is neither explicit nor vulgar, I suspect that most such claims ground out in "sex is just bad, just because" à la religion, which is also the sort of thing LW is intentionally skeptical of.
This is not a separate magisterium, and so I decided not to treat it as such. In theory, everything should be discussible on LW if viewed through rationalist lenses; some things (e.g. hot-button politics) are not in practice because they are (e.g.) ultimately too distracting, or they reliably spawn demon threads, or whatever.
But as the commentary thus far shows, this seems to be not-a-problem here.
LATE EDIT: Also, this is not front-page-able; like, it's specifically in my personal blog section and won't ever show up in the "randomly displayed to users" or "recent top posts" feeds. It does show up in "recently commented on," but that's all.
I found this compelling and switched my upvote to a strong upvote. Previously I was like "neat project, good post, not clear I want LW to be more like this". But now it's clear to me that I do want LW to be more like this.
Users can basically write whatever they want on their personal blog, and it just won't be frontpaged by moderators. (There are some exceptions to this, but not covering this type of post)
Note you can filter NSFW posts out of Latest Posts using the tag filters.
The policy we have, and that I like, is that users can bring their whole selves to LessWrong. In case, Duncan doesn't have to go hunt for another place to post his content (even supposing it doesn't have Rationality content, which I think it does, as he says elsethread).
I've got a comment on the personal blog / frontpage distinction I'd like to make at some point, but I'd like to do it in a meta thread instead of Duncan's essay. Does the mod team have one of those handy?
Edit: Also a note about NSFW tags and opt-in vs opt-out, if that's a separate meta.
I think doing it in the Open Thread probably makes most sense. (Or a top-level post if you feel like there's more meat to the ideas that needs more space)
I very much appreciated the way that this post brought out different people having very different reactions to you in a very intimate domain. I've had some tendency towards feeling "if a partner isn't happy with me sexually, then It Is Me Who Is Bad", and while I intellectually knew that to be false (especially given that some partners have also been happy with me), seeing it be false for another person is helpful for having the fact of its falsehood also sink in emotionally.
I certainly think there are people for whom this would be a bad idea, and I certainly think one should first pause to ponder the impact on the potential respondents (I had several layers of easing into the topic, from email subject line to email message saying "there's a survey" to then the survey itself, and this was still not quite enough to prevent one person on my list from having a Rough Day as a result).
But in general, i.e. for more than half the people out there, I think this is a really powerful learning experience and a good thing to at least consider trying. I very much am glad I did this and I think most of the people I know personally would benefit if they did it, too.
I do think that if I did this my responses would be more biased than yours because I would not be willing to send the survey to all the people I have contact info for, in part due to concerns kind of like this. But even biased data would still be interesting and useful, probably.
Did the participants know that their quotes were going to be in an essay, or is it possible they thought this was just for your eyes?
(I of course told my partners up front that a public essay was one possible outcome of the survey and that I would not-publish anything they flagged as private.)
Content warning: the title. While this essay is neither explicit nor vulgar, it talks frankly about the topic at hand in a PG-13 sort of way, and may be NSFW for many instances of W. I secured approval from LW leadership before posting.
What on Earth is this essay?
Well, I started wondering about the above question, and I decided to ask some people. I know a lot about what I want sex with me to be like—what sort of person I want to be in the bedroom, what sort of impact I hope to have on the people I’m intimate with. And of course I get substantial feedback through people’s nonverbals and little bits of pillow talk and so forth.
But I’d never really actually just asked, directly. So I did! I sent a broad, open-ended request for info to thirteen of the twenty-four people I’ve ever had sex with, and got back responses from twelve of them (and a polite “no thanks” from the thirteenth). I left out the ex from my longest relationship (who spent several years after breaking up with me being really quite vicious at unpredictable intervals), and there were a number of people (including a bunch of one-offs) that I had no way of getting in touch with. But represented among the respondents were:
Why this post?
A few reasons. First, I often think by writing, and I wanted to digest and distill and … collate? … the various responses I’d received, and make them all make sense together, and an essay felt like a pretty natural way to do that.
Second, I really liked the idea of there being something for potential future partners to look at, that was rooted in the direct, first-person data of past partners rather than wholly filtered through my own self-report. It seems like good information to have available, for people who are wondering if they would like being physically intimate with me! And I am fond of moves which simultaneously [attract people who are into your whole deal] and [deter people who are not], and both the essay itself and its specific contents seemed likely to do that.
Third: it is my belief that sex and sexuality have too much power in our society, that our mythology and mysticism around them give them even more power than they would naturally have, given human biology and psychology, and that the best path forward for us, as a culture, is to boring-ify and mundane-ify them. Writing this essay publicly rather than privately was a small act of bravery and a baby step toward being the change I want to see in the world.
(I of course told my partners up front that a public essay was one possible outcome of the survey and that I would not-publish anything they flagged as private.)
On completeness, and bias
A lot of the quotes and summaries to follow are nice! My partners and former partners said a lot of nice things (though not only nice things), and a lot of those things made me feel pretty good about myself.
There is a Certain Kind Of Reader who will see someone saying nice things about themselves of any kind (let alone in the fraught domain of sex and sexuality) and try to make that seem bad, somehow. I’ve elected not to try to make this essay proof against that sort of adversarial interpretation, and have spent basically no energy on modeling those readers outside of this paragraph.
Below, for context, is a visual, anonymized representation of the people I reached out to, out of the larger set of everyone I’ve ever had a sexual encounter with. The color of the square represents my prior sense of the-state-of-our-relationship/whether we were “cool” or not.
Note that the above heat map is not strongly correlated with sex in particular—of the four darkest squares, three of them said multiple specifically enthusiastic things about me-in-the-bedroom during the active stages of our relationship, and also never said anything specifically negative to me about sex either during or after.
(Also, my predictions were not perfect; based on the actual responses, I updated my sense of the overall state of those thirteen relationships as shown in the image below.)
I did my genuine best to gather representative data. I did not, for instance, intentionally exclude partners I expected were mad at me for whatever reason (the one notable exception being the aforementioned long-term ex). I also tried, in my summaries below, to accurately represent the data I received—I have not intentionally left out any large, relevant swaths of information, such that the overall picture would be knowingly misleading (though I have been protective of some small details that seemed … precious, either to me or to the respondent or both).
There’s obviously going to be some bias in who I managed to stay in touch with, and in what people are willing to say directly to me. But “thirteen out of thirteen people pinged replied, and twelve were actually willing to answer this weird-ass question” speaks to something I feel pretty justified in being proud of (going in, I expected to get three or four responses total).
INT: OFF-PEAK HOURS AT A SPARSELY POPULATED CAFÉ.
You and your close friend are sitting down for coffee. Your friend blinks in surprise and says “Wait—you had sex with Duncan? Duncan Sabien? …what’s that like??”
Category 1: The Physical
[insert several affectionate jokes about the length of my penis, and a couple of hasty reassurances about the circumference of my penis; overall the consensus is that we are trending more toward Gimli than toward Legolas.]
I'm 36 years old, around 5'8", around 200lbs/90kg. I'm white, mesomorph, not a lot of body hair. Unsurprisingly, the kind of people who end up in bed with me are also the kind of people who are at least a little bit into my body type[1].
Also, I happen to have a habit of—well—
... which can be controversial.
Miscellaneous:
(It can, I just have to shave)
And one that I'm weirdly proud of:
Category 2: The Logistical
I enjoy most of the vanilla combinations of mouth, hand, and [other body parts], though I buck the Millennial trend of, um, that one thing that Millennials made weirdly popular (I won't stop someone doing it to me but I think it means smooches are on hold for the time being, which is sad because I do like smooches). Nobody's managed to make my secondary erogenous zones reliably erogenous, though there have been glimmers.
I haven't got basically any experience at all with non-vanilla stuff; I expect I will enjoy it about as much as alcohol (which I don't like), but I've tried alcohol so I'm open to trying that, too. *shrug.*
That means that the below is all in response to pretty straightforward manual, oral, anal, and PIV sex; no BDSM or roleplay, no fetishes, not a lot of technology involved beyond the occasional vibrator or strapon.
(And almost all one-on-one rather than multiplayer; only three threesomes so far, and I haven't been invited to any orgies yet (alas).)
When it comes to the nuts and bolts, my partners say:
(Although:)
One thing that doing this survey has really hammered home for me is Different People Are Different:
I do, in fact, generally care a lot about my partner's experience/feel substantially other-oriented, which means that I want to try and learn about my partner's idiosyncrasies and what they like and dislike and I am often operating with the explicit goal of "help my partner have a good time," including practicing and getting better at things with feedback.
But there are a lot of people for whom that creates a highly unpleasant self-consciousness, and so in the event that my other-focus seems bad or counterproductive I just ... don't do it.
(More on this in a later section.)
Things don't always go as planned:
... communication helps a lot, but as that particular partner noted, there are also a lot of obstacles to making requests or offering nudges, and sometimes it doesn't occur to me to ask. Other partners had some thoughts that rhymed:
I might be more on the same wavelength with some partners than with others:
A lot of people specifically noted that I'm quiet.
One note that didn't fit anywhere else:
Category 3: How it feels to be you, with me
Category 4: On "werewolfing[2]"
I felt seen by a lot of the comments I got back, but this one was particularly resonant:
Other partners had thoughts on the same vibe:
One long thought, all from one person:
Another partner on the same wavelength:
This is not a straightforwardly uncomplicated good, though.
... and with at least two partners, something about the way I relate to sex and sexuality overall was actively bad for them (and in at least one case it was quite bad).
(There is more along these lines from these two partners, but those are the aforementioned quotes that feel precious/sacred, and which I don't want to chop up and put on display. One of them I was not surprised by, and the other I was, and I am still trying to digest all of that, and my thoughts and feelings around having collided with them in this way/having been upstream of them feeling like that. I'm going to put in a couple of pictures in lieu of a few more direct quotes, so that this part of the story isn't brushed past or glossed over. So that it ... takes up an appropriate amount of space. I tried to choose pictures whose mood closely matches that of the missing quotes.)
It feels like there might be more to say, but if there is, I'm not sure what it is. This is what it's like to have sex with me (or, in a phrasing that feels righter, somehow: what it's like for people when we do sex stuff together). I guess the final piece that seems most likely to be of interest to a reader is something like "how do I, Duncan, feel about all of the above?"
And for the most part, I think I feel seen, and fairly described, and ... content? There are things I wish had been different, especially for the partners I focused on near the end. But for the most part, the people I've been intimate with seem to have picked up on The Thing I Am Trying To Do, and The Way I Am Trying To Be. Not everybody wants that, and even with the people who do, it hasn't always worked out for the best. But for the most part, I'm coming through loud and clear.
That's nice to know, rather than just hoping.
(And hopefully this essay will make it even moreso, in the future.)
Appendix 1: The Questions Asked
Appendix 2: Interest Form
The title of the form is "Maybe I want to have sex with Duncan??"
Line breaks within the blockquotes represent a shift between different speakers, unless otherwise noted.
"Werewolfing" is local jargon referring to the way that some (many? Most?) people transform in sexual contexts, plausibly especially cishet men. More detail here.