When I looked at the genders of dance callers at large contra dance
events several years
ago there was an interesting pattern where events were more likely
to book a man and a woman than you'd expect by chance. With more
years worth of data to look at, I thought it was worth checking if
this was still the case.
To see the effect most clearly, I looked at events with two
binary callers. [1] Here's what I saw:
You can see that events with one female and one male caller are the
most common, but you'd also expect this even if bookers were
selecting both slots independently because there are two ways to get a
male-female pair and only one way each to get a male-male or
female-female pair. What we can do, however, is generate another set
of lines representing the expected number in each category if bookers
were selecting independently:
The idea is that if, say, 40% of slots went to men than you'd normally
expect to see two men 16% (40% * 40%) of the time, two women 36% (60%
* 60%) of the time, and one of each 48% (40% * 60% + 60% * 40%) of the
time. That we see one of each 63% of the time for 2026-2024 instead
of 48% tells us that about some bookers are gender-balancing callers.
What these statistics don't tell us, however, is the gender
distribution we would get if bookers didn't consider this as a
factor. You could think that this factor leads to fewer women being
booked (because bookers are avoiding booking two women and there are
more female callers) or that this leads to fewer men being booked
(because booking two male callers looks regressive). One way to try
to get at this would be to look at events with only one caller. While
they might try to balance over years, I would at least expect the
effect to be smaller? Here's what I see:
(Note that I don't have this data for before 2016)
It seems to me that at the beginning of this period the booking
preference for gender balance was leading to fewer female callers at
two-caller events, since single caller events were much more likely to
book a female caller. More recently, however, these have converged,
which I think means that, under the assumption that single-caller
events reflect the uninfluenced ratio of male to female callers, the
preference for gender balance is affecting which gigs men and women
get but isn't affecting how many?
I was curious whether this phenomenon was primarily driven by a subset
of events, and tried looking to see if there were events that only
booked male-female pairs. I only found five events in this category
with at least four years of data, however, which is about as many as
you'd expect by chance. I think this tells us that to the extent that
bookers have this preference it's not their only consideration, which
isn't very surprising. I don't think there are enough observations to
say anything more specific than the general preference for balance,
because we have relatively few booking records by many events.
[1] I don't know how everyone identifies, so I've done the best I
could. Most of this is by first name, with searches on "[caller]
contra" to look for pronouns in tricky cases.
When I looked at the genders of dance callers at large contra dance events several years ago there was an interesting pattern where events were more likely to book a man and a woman than you'd expect by chance. With more years worth of data to look at, I thought it was worth checking if this was still the case.
To see the effect most clearly, I looked at events with two binary callers. [1] Here's what I saw:
You can see that events with one female and one male caller are the most common, but you'd also expect this even if bookers were selecting both slots independently because there are two ways to get a male-female pair and only one way each to get a male-male or female-female pair. What we can do, however, is generate another set of lines representing the expected number in each category if bookers were selecting independently:
The idea is that if, say, 40% of slots went to men than you'd normally expect to see two men 16% (40% * 40%) of the time, two women 36% (60% * 60%) of the time, and one of each 48% (40% * 60% + 60% * 40%) of the time. That we see one of each 63% of the time for 2026-2024 instead of 48% tells us that about some bookers are gender-balancing callers.
What these statistics don't tell us, however, is the gender distribution we would get if bookers didn't consider this as a factor. You could think that this factor leads to fewer women being booked (because bookers are avoiding booking two women and there are more female callers) or that this leads to fewer men being booked (because booking two male callers looks regressive). One way to try to get at this would be to look at events with only one caller. While they might try to balance over years, I would at least expect the effect to be smaller? Here's what I see:
(Note that I don't have this data for before 2016)
It seems to me that at the beginning of this period the booking preference for gender balance was leading to fewer female callers at two-caller events, since single caller events were much more likely to book a female caller. More recently, however, these have converged, which I think means that, under the assumption that single-caller events reflect the uninfluenced ratio of male to female callers, the preference for gender balance is affecting which gigs men and women get but isn't affecting how many?
I was curious whether this phenomenon was primarily driven by a subset of events, and tried looking to see if there were events that only booked male-female pairs. I only found five events in this category with at least four years of data, however, which is about as many as you'd expect by chance. I think this tells us that to the extent that bookers have this preference it's not their only consideration, which isn't very surprising. I don't think there are enough observations to say anything more specific than the general preference for balance, because we have relatively few booking records by many events.
[1] I don't know how everyone identifies, so I've done the best I could. Most of this is by first name, with searches on "[caller] contra" to look for pronouns in tricky cases.
Comment via: facebook, mastodon