“What do AI safety/accelerationist people disagree on that they could bet on? What concrete things are going to happen in the next two years that would prove one party right or wrong?”
That seems to me quite confused. Why would you expect that concrete things appear in the next two years that can prove either side wrong?
A lot of what AI safety people worry is about, is the dynamics of a world where most of the power is held by AI.
Most power won't be held by AI in the next two years so we can't make any observations that tell us about the future dynamics.
AI safety people made some predictions like the difficulty of boxing AI which came true when we now see ChatGPT browsing the internet instead of being boxed but further similar predictions are unlikely to convince any accelerationist people. The same goes for predictions of autonomous weapon systems.
I swear I will get back to doing these weekly so they’re not so damn long. As always, feel free to skim and skip around!
The Progress Forum
More from Roots of Progress fellows
Opportunities
Job opportunities
Fundraising/investing opportunities
Policy opportunities
Gene editing opportunities
Events
Obituaries
News & announcements
Starship launches
New ventures
New books
Other new publications
Bio news
Nuclear news
Housing news
AI
AI leadership announcements
AI product announcements
AI predictions
AI safety
AI regulation
Podcasts
Articles and other links
Queries
If you have a helpful answer, please click through and reply:
Social media
Quotes
“Before Kendall Square was a leading biotech hub, it was a leading manufacturing hub” (@Atelfo). Robert Buderi, Where Futures Converge:
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (via @michael_nielsen)
A story via @stewartbrand, who says “That’s the way to run a culture”:
T. S. Elliot:
Charts
“Great graph in the latest Works in Progress headline piece by Hannes Malmberg” (@antonhowes)
Progress in fiber optic transmission (via @varma_ashwin97). I used to think the exponential advancement of Moore’s Law was a unique and amazing phenomenon. Turns out exponential progress is everywhere (and not just in information technology):
“60% of the time it happens 57% of the time. Manifold Markets is pretty well calibrated” (@NathanpmYoung)
“Good news of the day: We’ve reduced sulfur dioxide pollution by 94% over the last 40 years (and mostly solved the acid rain problem)” (@AlecStapp)
“NEPA environmental reviews just get longer and longer and longer… (this trend is driven by litigation and will not stop without permitting reform)” (@AlecStapp)
“One society where the suicide rate is highly correlated with the unemployment rate (Japan, red), and one society where it is not at all correlated (Spain, blue)” (@nick_kapur)
“Where you can drink tap water is a fairly good economic indicator (GDP per capita). It roughly matches up with countries where GDP (PPP) per capita is at least US $22,000” (@pitdesi)
Aesthetics
“Walked by 51st and Madison today to see our work, just installed on the Villard Houses. First addition to the NY landscape” (@mspringut, founder of Monumental Labs)