Destiny Disrupted was critical history reading for me, and helped break me out of a Eurocentric viewing of the world before college. I've tried very, very hard to find a history book from Chinese, Russian, or Indian authors that has the same insider's point of view but written in accessible, plain English.
Aside from wanting to read similar books about other cultures/civilizations, I am reminded that it seemed a bit steeped in "post-9/11ism".
China: A History by John Keay provides an equivalent insider's view of China. It is written in accessible, plain English. I too looked for Russian and Indian books of the same vein but could not find any.
Original Islam, or whatever survives of it in the approved version of the Quran and the Hadith, was indeed impressive. Alas, once Quranic hermeneutics settled on the "abrogation method", rather than adopting the much more productive "harmonization method", so that verses such as "there is no compulsion in religion" were simply considered as not applying anymore because of newer verses, the potential for things going badly became a permanent fixture, always on the ready to cause problems.
I like it how modern, liberal Islamic scholars are trying to undo that mistake by going the harmonization way. Too bad they're a tiny minority, and that they're opposing millennia of traditions built on top of the very opposite take.
Interesting read. It almost makes me want to be Muslim, but I still have my reservations about that
Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World Through Islamic Eyes by Tamin Ansary is written for an audience that knows nothing about Islamic history. It is among my favorite history books. If you grew up on Eurocentric world history then Destiny Disrupted is like an speculative alternate history of the world that really happened. There is tons of cool stuff in it, like the world's first assassins.
My favorite part of the whole book was the story of Mohammad. If I could go back in time and talk to one person it would be him.
Mohammad
Mohammad was a merchant and a mystic.
Money
For an orphan in 6th century Arabia to end up running a caravan business you have to be exceptionally street-smart. Mohammad eventually expanded into religion, war, government and law.
Mysticism
If you come from a tradition like mainstream Islam, Christianity, Judaism, etc. then Mohammad's and Khadija's account may seem mysterious, magical or even fake. If you belong to a lineage with an living mystical tradition (i.e. you are familiar with the kind of meditation designed to produce mystical experiences) then nothing about Mohammad's mystical experiences is unusually exceptional.
Merchant and Yogi
Yogis travel far away from civilization for long periods of time so they can meditate. Traders thrive in the bustling centers of trade. Caravan traders tend not to be yogis and vice versa. It is hard to be both.
Yogis tend to have extremely powerful conviction…but not to do much with it. Merchants and warlords tend to do lots of things involving people…with less moral conviction than a monk. Mohammad led people with the moral conviction of a monk.
I find Mohammad fascinating because didn't amass power for selfish aims nor did he sit around philosophizing. Mohammad got to work.
6th Century Arabia
It is difficult for someone living in the modern First World to comprehend the mercilessness of pre-Islamic Arabia. Primitive technology tends to increase violence. Tribal politics tend to increase violence. Pastorialism tends to increase violence. Pastoralism near cities tends to increase violence even more. 6th century Arabia had all of them.
If you want to help widows and orphans in 6th century Arabia then one way to do it is to give money to the widows and orphans. But this only solves the problem for your lifetime. Setting up a tax-sheltered foundation was not an option.
If you wanted to break the cycle of violence then the only way to do it was to crush your enemies through fire and blood. Murdering your way to world peace is counterproductive. Even if everything goes right, it solves the problem for the lifetime of your dynasty.
Mohammad didn't just want to save a few widows and orphans. He didn't want to murder his enemies. He wanted to end the use of violence to murder one's enemies. And he succeeded, by establishing the Umma.
It is difficult for a citizen of a First World nation-state to understand the magnitude of what Mohammad achieved. It puts Mohammad on the power level of Genghis Khan and Qin Shihuang. Except he wasn't evil.
Mohammad built a nation-state a thousand years before the French Revolution.
The Arab world didn't want Mohammad to optimize it. They tried to assassinate him. They sent armies against him. It was necessary to fight non-Muslims to protect the Umma from being annihilated. But Mohammad made it crystal clear he was creating a religion of peace.
All states insist on a monopolization of the use of force. How was Mohammad's conquest different from any other empire? He sought out to break the cycle of tribal conflict in a way that that outlived himself. And it worked. When I buy injira or eat halal ramen I don't get asked for my race or nationality. Muslims ask if I am a fellow Muslim. Universal religions like Islam welcome everyone.
If you wanted to end the cycle of violence in 6th century Arabia then the only viable route was to create a protected space inside your social project while defending your borders with violence.
Mohammad slayed Moloch with Allah. For a while, at least.