Everything is heritable:
Politics/religion:
AI:
open_nsfw" (hilarious)Statistics/meta-science/mathematics:
Psychology/biology:
Technology:
Economics:
ISDS, Intl State Dispute arbitration for fun and profit, TPP style. Gonna be a four part series.
economics of finacialized countries, and nazi germany
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-supermanagerial-reich/
Are We Not Men - an interesting short story by T. Coraghessan Boyle about CRISPR gene-editing in the latest (Nov. 7) New Yorker.
Have also a virtual upvote by an acquaintance of mine, who is a professor of entomology. He found it "very tasty"!
I'm glad that you and your entomologist-friend enjoyed it, and thanks for the virtual and actual upvote! I thought it was quite a good story - thought provoking and entertaining. I don't know if it was intended to be funny, but I lol'ed at the antics of the crowparrots.
"Закрой за мной дверь, я ухожу" a clip made from Star Wars: A New Hope and Viktor Tsoy's "Close the door after me, I'm leaving". I wouldn't rec it here, but I keep re-watching it years after I saw it first. Doesn't require much knowledge of Russian, but here's the translation .
Stephan Hawking on SETI, METI, and AI, and space generally.
"Besides offering an ominous warning, though, the new 25-minute film sees Hawking explore other incredible spots in the Universe, such as Sagittarius A* – a supermassive black hole – and our Solar System’s very own Saturn, a planet that Hawking is fascinated with."
http://www.sciencealert.com/stephen-hawking-warns-that-we-might-not-want-to-reach-out-to-aliens
Link try from bottom of above page
CuriosityStream.
Crash course: Meta-ethics (Crash Course Philosophy #32) <- mostly classification, taxonomy, and a few thorny problems. Good review.
Join Leonardo DiCaprio as he explores the topic of climate change, and discovers what must be done today to prevent catastrophic disruption of life on our planet.
Before the Flood - Full Movie | National Geographic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90CkXVF-Q8M&feature=youtu.be
May be disabled, link said only good till Nov 6....
The link you have submitted is currently set to private. I watched this documentary on Youtube earlier.
The Top 100 Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord
"The Vital Question: Energy, Evolution, and the Origins of Complex Life" by Dr. Nick Lane.
This is a complicated book. The first third or so is a distillation of a particular current in origin-of-life research (one of two that are being productively extended recently, in my view) that focuses on energy and metabolism rather than replication or translation (the latter being the second main current which has also made amazing strides lately but I will not talk about here). By focusing on the shared fundamental core of energy metabolism, the author and his laboratory productively extend a hypothesis first put forward by the geologist Mike Russell tying the origins of life to geology rather than organic chemistry. Specifically, he notes that most aspects of the core energy metabolism of all life and the oldest known biomass-production mechanisms are recapitulated inorganically in a particular geological context, alkaline hydrothermal vents. These would have been much more common on the early Earth and in an anoxic environment would have spontaneously taken water, air, and mantle minerals and created concentrated deposits of organics alongside reactive iron sulfide minerals which strikingly resemble the iron-sulfur clusters in the reactive centers of the central metabolic enzymes of all life. This view of the origin of life puts metabolism and geochemistry first with genetics and heredity coming along as an afterthought that at first encouraged the reactions and then 'captured' them from the geosphere. This view also puts the origin of life as something almost chemically inevitable from the energy gradient present in this geological context, which would exist most anywhere in the universe you have the confluence of water, rock, and air.
The rest of the book deals with the author's thoughts on the origins of eukaryotes and complex life in general, mostly through the lens of the effects of having mitochondria on eukaryotic life. A few very important points about eukaryotes are made here, pointing out their origin was a very strange event given the huge constellation of weird traits that all eukaryotes share. He persuasively argues that the population genetic and energetic constrains presented by mitochondria explain a number of these odd traits. But he is very wedded to a particular model of the origin event, to an extent and degree of exclusivity that I do not think is warranted given several other strands of research about the origins of eukaryotic life and the biochemistry of mitochondria I am aware of. He is a bioenergetics type so he tends to see everything in terms of energy. Still makes some very important points but I would treat his conclusions (that the origin of eukaryotes is a freakish horribly unlikely one-off event in which a bacterium got inside an archaean and navigated a bizarre bioenergetic evolutionary gauntlet) as a hypothesis rather than anything resembling settled science.
So, Thomas Gold's Deep Biology still struggles along....but now everyone else gets research funding on it. sigh.
Not really. The proposed production of prebiotic organics occurs at the surface where hydrothermal fluids which have interacted with mantle-derived rocks, becoming alkaline and producing hydrogen gas within the fluid by oxidizing ferrous iron during serpentinization, hit the acidic CO2-bearing ocean, and the pH gradient triggers redox reactions between the H2 and CO2 creating water methane and small organics most of which vent to the ocean. Reactive iron sulfide minerals also condense out under the same conditions and further encourage the redox reactions and electron transfer in a way similar to in living methanogenic organisms. The organics produced by experiments recapitulating these environments are more like formaldehyde, small carbs, and acetic acid (with various phosphorylated or thioester derivatives that allow them to interact in interesting ways). None of this really resembles Thomas Gold's proposed and pretty well discredited ideas of high levels of promordial deep-mantle abiotic oil leakage driving large deep biospheres and would be concentrated locally within the pores of surface rocks at the vents themselves.
Granted, in this scenario once life escapes the vents by inventing its own way to locally create pH gradients and electron transfer, the early basal biosphere would be limited to chemolithotrophs exploiting redox gradients within rocks (potentially very deep but definitely limited in biomass) until something invents photosynthesis and would have started as thermophiles (though not hyperthermophiles), which were elements of his thoughts on the origin of life. It also fits with a point he made, that the origin of life should be thought of in a thermodynamic context.
I had a few paragraphs here, and links, and lost it all on posting. sigh.
well, here is a biological reactor for your enjoyment. in Russian tho...
How to Make Worlds
"Susan Stanford Friedman’s Planetary Modernisms (2015) asks us to rethink our habits of associating “modernism” with Euro-America. Comparing a number of specific cultures across three continents and eleven centuries, she shows how the historical conditions often ascribed to a uniquely advanced Europe—rapid technological innovation, artistic experimentation, social upheaval, and cosmopolitan mixing—also describe places and times that lie far off conventional maps of modernity, including Tang Dynasty China and Mughal India."
"The work of art is an especially self-aware kind of knowing because it knows it is an artifice, a mere model. But if all models simplify or abstract in order to make sense of existence or experience, then all models—scientific and historical and artistic—do the work of world-making.
What Cheah and Seltzer together make clear is that it is time to stop arguing about whether or not “the world” in world literature is too large an object of study. What is really at stake in the charge against world literature is in fact one specific, exceptionally destructive model of the world that has done too much world-making already: the enforced homogenization of cultures to serve Euro-American interests."
Mother of Storms is a science fiction novel by the author John Barnes.
Starts with an accidental triggering of the methane gun, enviro catastrophe ensues. Ends with a guy uploading and going into self-improvement mode. Interesting in how as his thinking accelerates, he ends up navel gazing about philosophy, art and planetary engineering.
Prob best for younger folk, as lots of focus on VR and sex too.
Touhou:
Doujin:
The Oatmeal: How to be perfectly unhappy <- This reminds me of On the unpopularity of cryonics: life sucks, but at least then you die
| Most people have a very limited range of interests and possibilities for gratification. This problem cannot be fixed for most by giving them more money, or even more money and autonomy. Do that, and they will drown themselves in what they already have, or kill themselves with drugs. How many cars, planes, and pairs of shoes or houses can you really gain joy from?
Happiness doesn't scale. Being engaged does.
I think I will probably stop contributing to the media threads. They're not being read by many people, and it's redundant with my existing newsletter - additional work for me to post and update. If people want to see my link collection, they can simply subscribe to my newsletter or read them on my website.
A RSS feed for finished newsletters at the end of every month which I can slap between my rationality related feeds would be delicious.
That makes me said, since I'm one of those reading and relishing it. I understand your motive, though.
Additional to that, you might want to consider posting larger completed stand-alone works directly into the discussion section as a link for discussion, feedback, and good karma.
This, media thread is kinda interesting but doesn't make me as interested as something in an open thread or separate post - mostly because there's more in-depth introduction to the material.
Additional to that, you might want to consider submitting larger completed stand-alone works directly to the main as a link for discussion, feedback, and good karma.
This is the monthly thread for posting media of various types that you've found that you enjoy. Post what you're reading, listening to, watching, and your opinion of it. Post recommendations to blogs. Post whatever media you feel like discussing! To see previous recommendations, check out the older threads.
Rules: