Comment Permalink

Gunslinger9y00

How does the promoted thing even work? There's only one article that was written recently (one year ago), two from 2009 and one from 2007. (all sequences)

Douglas_Knight9y20

Are you sure you're talking about Promoted? It has oldest entry from November. This is what I see (also, google cache). I wonder what Phil is seeing.

See in context

30 The increasing uselessness of Promoted

by PhilGoetz

19th Mar 2016

1 min read

30

For some time now, "Promoted" has been reserved for articles written by MIRI staff, mostly about MIRI activities. Which, I suppose, would be reasonable, if this were MIRI's blog. But it isn't. MIRI has its own blog. It seems to me inconvenient both to readers of LessWrong, and to readers of MIRI's blog, to split MIRI's material up between the two.

People visiting lesswrong land on "Promoted", see a bunch of MIRI blogs, mostly written by people who don't read LessWrong themselves much anymore, and get a mistaken impression of what people talk about on LessWrong. Also, LessWrong looks like a dying site, since often months pass between new posts.

I suggest the default landing page be "New", not "Promoted".

Site Meta

Personal Blog

30

The increasing uselessness of Promoted

New Comment

12 comments, sorted by

top scoring

Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 4:15 PM

[-]tim9y20

Good lord. I haven't been on LW in quite a while, but I wholeheartedly agree.

The collection of articles currently on the front page are painfully useless to someone looking to discuss "the art of human rationality" rather than be inundated with content blatantly serving the interests of a particular company/organization.

This content will (for the most part) appeal to people already in the fold. But what, in any way would a newcomer to the site gain from articles titled:

[ACRONYMYOUHAVENEVERHEARDOF] Is Hiring!
Why Is Our Company Great? Click Here To Find Out!
Donate Money To Us, Please!
Read About What Our Company Does - It's Super Important!
Please, Take Our Survey And Maybe WIN BIG!

Are these massively unfair oversimplifications of the actual content of the articles? Yes. Are these roughly along the lines of what a newcomer to the site will hear in their brain when they look at the front page? Almost certainly.

[-]Gleb_Tsipursky9y20

This makes sense to me, but perhaps it's best expressed in the LessWrong potential changes post

[-]PhilGoetz9y00

Oops. Yes. I can't move a post to a comment, though.

[-]Gleb_Tsipursky9y00

Just post a link to your post there.

[-]CronoDAS9y20

Yes, this has been a problem for some time - I just bookmarked the "New" page and completely ignored "Promoted" since the beginning...

[-]bogus9y20

Well, /new is used for meetup announcements these days. Maybe you meant the Discussion page (where this post is)?

[-]CronoDAS9y20

That was back when Main actually had content.

[-]Douglas_Knight9y00

/new is meetup announcements only if you aren't logged in. If you are logged in, I think it filters out irrelevant ones. I don't have a location set, so I don't see any of them (except Frank's roundups). But you're obviously logged in...

[-]Gram_Stone9y20

I agree, keeping in mind that this is easily reversible and that promoted posts will remain visible. And if anyone is thinking that this would reduce the apparent quality of the blog, the very worst Main posts are usually moved to Discussion by an administrator/moderator.

As for the plausibility of implementation, this blog ultimately does not belong to its userbase.

[-]Gunslinger9y00

How does the promoted thing even work? There's only one article that was written recently (one year ago), two from 2009 and one from 2007. (all sequences)

[-]Douglas_Knight9y20

Are you sure you're talking about Promoted? It has oldest entry from November. This is what I see (also, google cache). I wonder what Phil is seeing.

[-]Gunslinger9y00

I mixed it up with 'featured articles'. Sorry.

Moderation Log