This is a linkpost for https://substack.com/home/post/p-147019742
New Blog Post Against AI Doom
3harfe
5Oleg Trott
1Noah Birnbaum
2Seth Herd
2JBlack
New Comment
This was already referenced here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MW6tivBkwSe9amdCw/ai-existential-risk-probabilities-are-too-unreliable-to
I think it would be better to comment there instead of here.
1This post was worth looking at, although its central argument is deeply flawed.
I commented on the other linkpost: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MW6tivBkwSe9amdCw/ai-existential-risk-probabilities-are-too-unreliable-to?commentId=fBsrSQBgCLZd4zJHj
The post isn't even Against AI Doom. It is against the idea that you can communicate a high confidence in AI doom to policy makers.
I'm curious as to what y'all think of the points made in this post against AI risk from 2 AI researchers at Princeton. If you have reason to think any points made are particularly good or bad, write it in the comments below!