This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
Confusion / muddled reasoning. I felt your submission has a bit too much confusion or muddled thinking to approve. Reasons I check the box for this feedback item include things like “really strange premises that aren’t justified”, “inferences that don’t seem to follow from the premises,” “use of weird categories,” “failure to understand basics topics of what it discusses (e.g. completely misunderstand how LLMs work)”, and/or “failure to respond to basic arguments about the topic”. Often the right thing to do in this case is read more about the topic you’re discussing.
I have a difference concept of the Big Bang Theory, may be due to my bi-polar type 1 disorder and may be not. :)
Space-Time expansion theory bothers me a lot. We and our telescopes are observers with finite vision trying to see the infinite unobservable universe. Our mathematical models can explain only so much due to the constraints of the mathematical theories they are based on. We cannot even measure zero properly, forget about trying to measure infinity. I believe that the universe is finite due to the cyclical nature of space-time.
Let us consider the overall universe as a conveyor belt spinning around two drums. As an observer sitting on a train, universe seems to be expanding in the direction of the movement of the train. Our galaxy and our earth within the galaxy could be positioned anywhere on the conveyor belt. For the observer, it seems like the universe is expanding, but the universe is completing a rotation around the drums giving the impression of the expansion. One rotation from point A on the upper side to Point B on the lower side of the conveyor could take billions of years. Gravitoelectromagnetism is produced by the rotation. May be Blackhole or worm holes are the link between the upper and lower part of the belt. Multi-verse theory could be the result of this behaviour. For the observer, the universe seems to be expanding in all directions, but the actual direction is either clockwise or anticlockwise and it cannot be both. Space-time rotation must be unidirectional. If the space-time fabric is truly expanding and the distance between the galaxies is increasing, then why the distance between the planets within our gravitationally bound galaxy remains relatively constant in the big scheme of the universe? Space-time warp should be flattening at some point. Maybe we have another earth on either above or below us on the conveyor belt with a different experience. There is no beginning and there is no end. Maybe I am crazy. What do you think?