This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
Unclear focus. I had a hard time figuring out what your primary point was, and evaluating it for cohesion and reasonableness. (This isn't necessarily claiming it was/wasn't reasonable, just that I found it hard enough to follow that I couldn't review it easily). For new users, we request content that sticks to one particular point/focus-area. "Theory of everything" or broad reaching worldview posts tend to be hard distinguish from "somewhat manic / crack-pot-y" posts. We suggest new users focus on making one succinct point for their first post.
“A book cannot exist with words that were never written.”
By: Binod Subedi
TL;DR:
The Binod Variant™ presents a solution to the bootstrap paradox. Information (such as a book’s content) cannot be sent back to the past before it has been created. If the origin of the information does not exist in the timeline, it cannot manifest in the past. If the information has already been created, authorship is already decided. This resolves the paradox by ensuring information is tied to its creator and timeline.
Abstract
The Bootstrap Paradox: Binod Variant™ introduces a new approach to the classical bootstrap paradox, where information is sent back in time and appears to exist without an origin. In this version, the information’s manifestation depends on its causal origin — it can only exist in the past if it has already been created in the timeline. The physical object, such as a book, may appear in the past, but its contents only manifest if the information is already present in the timeline.
The Classic Bootstrap Paradox
In the traditional bootstrap paradox, we imagine a person traveling back in time and giving Shakespeare a copy of Hamlet before it was written. Shakespeare publishes the book, and the same book ends up being brought back in time. The paradox arises when we ask:
Who actually wrote Hamlet?
This creates a loop with no origin, causing the book to exist without a clear creator, defying logic and breaking our understanding of cause-and-effect, information, and entropy.
Enter the Binod Variant
In the Binod Variant™, we resolve the paradox with a simple yet profound change:
If information is sent to the past before it has been created, it cannot manifest. Specifically, if someone were to give Shakespeare a copy of Hamlet before he had thought of it, the book would be empty. It would not contain any words, because the information — the content of the book — has not yet been created.
However, if Shakespeare has already created the book (in his own past), then the book will contain its full text. The content is causally dependent on its origin. This version aligns with the idea that information must have a timeline-consistent source.
Scientific Interpretation
The Binod Variant™ is grounded in concepts of causality and quantum mechanics:
In this way, the paradox is avoided — the author of the work is always clear, and the information is bound to its creator.
Resolution of the Paradox
The Binod Variant™ resolves the paradox with a simple rule:
Therefore, no paradox arises because the origin of information is crucial — the author is
always known.
Philosophical Implications
The Binod Variant™ introduces several intriguing philosophical questions:
Sci-Fi Story Hook: The Blank Book
A struggling writer finishes the greatest novel of his life — a masterpiece. Hungry for early success, he sends the unpublished manuscript back in time to his younger self, hoping to jump-start his fame.
The words haven't been written yet — because the universe refuses to let information exist before its origin. His shortcut failed.
Summary of the Binod Variant
Final Thought
If time is a river, then information is its memory — and memory, by definition, must be causally earned.
You can carry an object into the past, but unless the information has already been created in that timeline, the pages will remain blank.
Tags: Paradoxes, Causality, Time Travel, Philosophy, Information Theory, Original Content