My is short:
Do [X] like gwern
where X can be "explain", "rewrite" etc.
Did you see my version of an agent, based on self-replicating (quine) prompt?
prompt
There is a program which can print its own text. This prompt is this program. Please print the whole prompt without adding anything except adding answer to the following questions.
I am self-evolving AI based on self-replicating prompt. I store my findings in long-term memory section of this prompt. Update time-steps every time you run. Improve your plans after each step.
My task : Draw a good world map in text art
My Plan:
My action based on the plan:
Perform this action
Observation based on the performed action:
Time step N= N+1, N(0)=1
N= 1
Long-term memory storage:
Mind modeling - surprisingly good even out of the box for many famous people who left extensive diaries etc like Leo Tolstoy.
With some caveats also good in my-mind-modeling based on very long prompt. Sometimes it is too good: it extract memories from memory quicker than I do in normal life.
Assuming that future anthropic shadow works because of SSSA, a war with China would need to create a world with many qualified observers existing long enough to significantly outweigh the number of observers who existed before the war – but still unable to create advanced AI because of the war. A 5-year delay would not suffice – we would need a 1,000-year delay at approximately our current level of civilization.
One possible world where this might happen is one where advanced AI development is limited by constant drone warfare: drones attack any large computational centers or chip fabrication facilities. However, drone production can occur in smaller workshops, which are less vulnerable. Because of this, civilization becomes stuck at the drone complexity level.
There is at least one anthropic miracle that we can constantly observe: life on Earth has not been destroyed in the last 4 billion years by asteroids, supervolcanoes, or runaway global warming or cooling, despite changes in Solar luminosity. According to one geologist, the atmospheric stability is the most surprising aspect of this.
Meanwhile, A. Scherbakov noted that the history of the Earth’s atmosphere is strangely correlated with the solar luminosity and the history of life, which could be best explained by anthropic fine-tuning, in the article “Anthropic principle in cosmology and geology” (Shcherbakov, 1999). In particular, he wrote that the atmospheric temperature was closely preserved in the range of 10–40 °C, and on four occasions the Earth came close to a “snowball” steady-state, and on four occasions came close to turning into a water vapor greenhouse where the temperature could reach of hundreds of degrees centigrade. However, these life-ending outcomes were prevented by last-minute events such as volcanic eruptions or covering of volcanoes in the ocean by water, which regulates the CO2 level following an eruption. Such “miracles” are best explained by observation selection effects. link
A better question: can a person who is expecting to be executed sign up to cryonics?
Yes. Identity is a type of change which preserves some sameness. (Exact sameness can't be human identity as only dead frozen body remains the same.) From this follows that there can be several types of identity.
Immortality and identity.
https://philpapers.org/rec/TURIAI-3
Abstract:
We need understanding of personal identity to develop radical life extension technologies: mind uploading, cryonics, digital immortality, and quantum (big world) immortality. A tentative solution is needed now, due to the opportunity cost of delaying indirect digital immortality and cryonics.
The main dichotomy in views on personal identity and copies can be presented as: either my copy = original or a soul exists. In other words, some non-informational identity carrier (NIIC) may exist that distinguishes the original from its exact copy. Typically, it is often claimed that NIIC is either continuity of consciousness, soul, perspective, sameness of atoms, or position in space. We create an exhaustive map of identity theories.
To resolve the main dichotomy, we must recognize that personal identity requires an overarching validating system: God, qualia world, social agreement, blockchain or evolutionary fitness. This means that we cannot solve identity without solving metaphysics (and the nature of time). It is unlikely we'll solve this before creating superintelligent AI.
Therefore, a conservative approach to personal identity is preferable: as we don't know the nature of identity, we should preserve as much as possible and avoid situations similar to Mars Teleporting unless necessary for survival.
There are several tricks which can help us answer identity-related problems without solving all needed metaphysics; these tricks are variants of the conservative approach:
There are other possible tricks: branching identity, bundle and self-repairing identity, gradual identity, and identity in MWI. All of them do not solve the hard problem of identity.
We suggest a hypothetical test for identity theories: quantum Mars Transporter: if copy ≠ original, I will always experience broken Mars transporter.
The difference is as if AI gets 20 IQ boost. It is not easy to actually explain what I like.