gadyp

A common view is that the timelines to risky AI are largely driven by hardware progress and deep learning progress occurring outside of Open

What's the justification for this view? It seems like significant deep learning process happens inside of OpenAI.

Many people (both at OpenAI and elsewhere) believe that questions of who builds AI and how are very important relative to acceleration of AI timelines.

If who builds AI is such an important question for OpenAI, then why would they publish capabilities research thus giving up majority of control on who builds AI and how?

At this point I think it's fairly clear that if OpenAI were focused on making the long-term future good they