All the Following are Distinct
In an artificial being, all the following: * Consciousness * Emotionality * Intelligence * Personality * Creativity * Volition are distinct properties that, in theory, may be activated independently. Let me explain. What I Hope to Achieve By publishing this post, I hope to develop and standardise some useful terms and concepts often found in many other posts. I also wish to explain in which sense some properties are linked to others - and, importantly, when they are not. I hope this post will be of help and provide a common context for future further discussions. What I am not trying to achieve is some universal definition of consciousness/intelligence/… simply because that’s too hard! To avoid controversies, I will focus on operational facets and nothing more[1]. I am still aware that the final result will be very opinionated, so feel free to challenge me and open my mind. The Basics Let’s suppose you walk around a new planet and you find some kind of system (artificial or natural - it doesn’t matter) that is able to “autonomously” execute general computations (digital, analog, quantum - it doesn’t matter, and it doesn’t matter which ones and why). Think of it as a universal Turing machine[2]: we’ll call such a system a computational being. Of course, I could just call it a computer - but the problem is that most people don’t recognise themselves as “computers”, hence the term has some semantic bias; also, would you consider an ecosystem as a “computer”? And yet an ecosystem can run computations, if you are inclined to interpret in that way the lifecycle of its inhabitants while they maintain (unknowingly) a stable equilibrium. So, let me use “computational being” as an umbrella term and as the foundation for the rest of the discussion. * Natural examples of computational beings: any living being is also a computational being. Selfish genes favour, by means of natural selection, computations that support their own reproduction. The competition betwee
Thanks to the author for this post and this study! I tend to think that it would be safer to systematically curb directive, expressive, judicative, or suggestive acts (I am using these terms based on speech act's theory) while training LLMs. Playing any role other than a pure analyst is very likely going to bring unexpected results. I wrote this idea as trait 9 in one of my posts here https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Bf3ryxiM6Gff2zamw/control-vectors-as-dispositional-traits