Hello folks, first post on LessWrong, so I apologize if I am not familiar with the decorum of this community. However, I have observed there seems to be a bit of disagreement or uncertainty about the comparative utility of prediction markets and (or vs.) debate/argument maps.
From my view, as the founder of a nonprofit organization which uses "debate/argument maps" (deceptively tree-like in appearance, though a graph in nature) to model civilization-scale reasoning on complex issues, it is evident to me that prediction markets and debate/argument maps are useful for different types of questions.
In case this hadn't occurred to others, or some would find me mistaken, I am providing and subjecting my point... (read 698 more words →)
I asked a leading question of our "Perspectives" system, and it gave a few hundred hypothetical reasons (here)