I'd be happy to help. 10 for start.
I am considering buying a household ozonizer. Only good quality ozonizer (there are many of them on the market, but they provide insufficient concentration).
Household ozonizers have a double effect:
1. Kill viruses and bacteria in the room, also preventing their reproduction and spread
2. Through breathing saturate the blood with ozone (O3), which enhances natural immunity.
In addition to air ozonation, there is also ozonation of water and oils - for gargling and drinking/food preparation.
When choosing an ozonizer as the "baseline", I consider the effectiveness of ozone when exposed to the influenza virus: it is argued that the virus dies 100% with an ozone concentration of 0.2 mg / m³ and an exposure of 60... (read more)
There is another type of disaster that is not mentioned: war.
Not nuclear war, but more or less "ordinary", or civil war.
I think, that most of those who read Less Wrong believe that civil war or neighboring country invasion is highly improbable for their countries, and that the chances of a nuclear strike are even higher.
I live in Eastern Ukraine, and when in 2014 the war began, it was a complete surprise and shock for everyone.
I live in the region adjacent to those where military operations are ongoing, and in 2014-2015 the question of preparing for some kind of emergency actions in case the war reaches us has become practical,... (read more)
Yes it does. I was “hooked” by this whole idea also because screenwriting is a legacy of the theater, and theater, and the mysteries that preceded it, were used in ancient times as a “psychotherapeutic” tool. (If we have the right to say so).
I read the description of the ancient Egyptian mysteries (I don’t know to what extent it corresponded to the truth) - there in the first "acts" they talked about Osiris, his history, etc., always emphasizing his "sunny", "summer" nature. And at the very end of the mystery, the priest whispered in the ear of the initiate: "Osiris is a dark god." Even in a simple retelling, this phrase was to some extent a shock - at the same time as surprise and “synthesis”.
I want to share an exercise that I have been using for a long time - to integrate ideas and subagents (if to speak using multiagent model of mind)
What topics is the exercise related to:
1. Mitigation of cognitive distortions such as the stereotype of physical attractiveness
2. Sequence "Multiagent models of mind", article “Why Subagents?”
3. article "Being the (Pareto) Best in the World"
Two sources are the basis for this exercise:
- the idea (and practices) of Western esoterics on “biners neutralization” (in particular, quite widely and extensively it is described in the book “The Great Arcana of the Tarot” by Vladimir Shmakov, I don’t know if the book is translated into English)
- the method for developing the theme in screenwriting (in particular, “Substance, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting” by Robert McKee)
Here, I describe the exercise as... (read 4191 more words →)
I tried to use Roam about a month ago. I like the idea, but Roam has bugs, when I use it from PC, and wasn't working on my laptop at all. It is just not ready to invest time.