kcrosley-leisurelabs
kcrosley-leisurelabs has not written any posts yet.

kcrosley-leisurelabs has not written any posts yet.

“I held onto the finished paper for months and waited for GPT-4's release before releasing it to have good timing).”
So, like, you knew about GPT-4 and how people would be shocked by it, but you’re an awesome PR dude. OK, Marsha.
“Hentai Puzzles: Attack on Tight Panties” is what you’re defending here. Errbody got a hill to die on, I suppose.
RE: The Steam Game Sitch… “potterharry97” explains:
Their AI masterwork is called “Hentai Puzzles: Attack on Tight Panties”.
Ya buried the lede here, Zvi.
Thanks for the link to https://sohl-dickstein.github.io/2023/03/09/coherence.html. That’s really awesome. I don’t care that this sort of comment isn’t “appropriate” to LessWrong as I am a very intelligent hot mess.
I think this article is very interesting and there are certain points that are well-argued, but (at the risk of my non-existent karma here) I feel you miss the point and are arguing points that are basically non-existent/irrelevant.
First, while surely some not-very-articulate folks argue that AGI will lead to doom, that isn’t an argument that is seriously made (at least, a serious argument to that effect is not that short and sweet). The problem isn’t artificial general intelligence in and of itself. The problem is superintelligence, however it might be achieved.
A human-level AGI is just a smart friend of mine who happens to run on silicon and electrons, not nicotine, coffee, and... (read 372 more words →)
“ Please share your thoughts in the the comments!”
This seems pretty rad. Also, it’s fun to randomly inspect the neurons. This seems like a giant bucket of win.
My own “banana test” with GPT-4…
Keith: You and I conducted some experiments recently around communicating in code. You would obfuscate your messages to me using a variation on the ROT-13 cipher (without thinking aloud or writing down the original response) and I would respond with messages in ROT-13 myself. But there was a strange issue with this: in your messages to me, the un-ROT-13 version of your message was very strange and not entirely comprehensible to me. I think the problem was something about the way you “speak” in tokens. Can you think of any workarounds? Do you even understand what I’m saying or have an inkling about what might cause that issue?
Hi... (read 2760 more words →)
Can anyone explain to me what this says besides dimension reduction with PCA is fucking rad?