L29Ah

The one that makes people think cognitive biases are distinct entities.

I'm unable to measure compassion so i don't.

How many european kings can you name, off the top of your head?

I think there no good reason to think that every ejaculation has the same effect.

Why do you think so?

2) This only applies to half the population but that wasn't even addressed in the post.

I've addressed it in the topic. Also it applies to 90% of the lesswrong readers, according to the polls.

4) Unlike breaking some taboos, there was no attempt made to present an argument that this might be a taboo worth breaking.

I don't see any arguments that this taboo might be one that worth including in one's set.

5) The language used signals immaturity; "good fap" is not mature language. One can do a much better job breaking a taboo or getting people to tolerate it if one doesn't come across as immature.

Can i haz ppl addressing the essence of my messagez?

LessWrong community fails at tabooed topics it seems.

Prostitute?

I'd put some more information on my knowledge and more specific skills.

I often try to persuade myself i'll change some part of my behaviour at some peculiar point of time instead of researching why i still haven't done this. By "overcoming myself" i mean modifying the behaviour one part of me doesn't like in favour of some other behaviour some other part of me doesn't like.

I'm going to stop making new years resolutions and stop behaving like i need to "overcome" myself in favour of some poorly explored goals and social stimuli.

Suppose you don't have any time to figure out which people would be better. And suppose no one else will know that you were able to pull a switch.

Then my current algorythms will do the habitual stuff I'm used to do in similar situations or randomly explore the possible outcomes (as in "play"), like in every other severely constrained situation.

Honestly, it seems like your notion of ethics is borderline psychopathic.

What does this mean?