All of bhishma's Comments + Replies

bhishma10

Probably do a screen recording to scale later with AI

bhishma10

Jeffrey, I appreciate your points about fusion's potential, and the uncertainty around "foom." However, I think framing this in terms of bottlenecks clarifies the core difference. The Industrial Revolution was transformative because it overcame the energy bottleneck. Today, while clean energy is vital, many transformative advancements are primarily bottlenecked by intelligence, not energy. Fusion addresses an important, existing constraint, but it's a step removed from the frontier of capability. AI, particularly AGI, directly targets that intelligence bot... (read more)

2Garrett Baker
This seems false given that AI training will be/is bottlenecked on energy.
bhishma910

I think a crucial distinction, which you touch on but perhaps don't fully emphasize, lies in the downstream consequences of success in each field. While both are transformative, the nature of that transformation is radically different.

Fusion, if achieved at scale, primarily addresses the energy sector. It's a substitutional technology. It replaces fossil fuels with a cleaner, more abundant alternative, mitigating climate change and potentially altering geopolitical power dynamics related to energy resources. This is undeniably significant. However, beyond ... (read more)

4Jeffrey Heninger
I agree that this is plausibly a real important difference, but I do not think that it is obvious. The most recent augmentative technological change was the industrial revolution. It has reshaped virtually every every activity. It allowed for the majority of the population to not work in agriculture for the first time since the agricultural revolution. The industrial revolution centered on energy. Having much cheaper, much more abundant energy allowed humans to use that energy for all sorts of things.  If fusion ends up being similar in cost to existing electricity production, it will be a substitutional technology. This is the thing that we are working on now (well, also making it work at all). People who work in fusion focus on this because it is the reasonable near/medium term projection. If fusion ends up being substantially cheaper, it will be an augmentative technology. It is not at all clear that this will happen, because we can't know how the costs will change between the first and thousandth fusion power plant. Notably, we don't know if foom is going to be a thing either. The narrative around the technology is at least as important as what has happened in the technology itself. The fusion community could frequently talk about how incredible the industrial revolution was, and how it powered Britain to global dominance for two centuries. A new source of energy might do the same thing ! But this is more hype than we feel we ought to offer, and the community's goal is not to create a dominant superpower. Even if foom is going to happen, things would look very different if the leaders credibly committed to helping others foom if they are first. I don't know if this would be better or worse from a existential risk perspective, but it would change the nature of the race a lot.
bhishma40

Have you looked into https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04378

1egor.timatkov
I haven't, no! It seems interesting, I'll check it out

Looks like there might be some test data leakage https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/123035

This is very similar to the Julia Galef's framing of Hayekians vs Central planners, which I have found to be quite useful to look at these sort of dynamics. It's also a bit like the exploration/exploitation tradeoff. Initially when you have high uncertainty, it makes a lot of sense to wander and follow your curiosity as that would be more productive. And once you've gathered enough about something, it's much easier to apply the said knowledge. 

. Before the toddler ever hears the word,

 

It goes even back for certain visual stimuli 

We examined fetal head turns to visually presented upright and inverted face-like stimuli. Here we show that the fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy is more likely to engage with upright configural stimuli when contrasted to inverted visual stimuli, in a manner similar to results with newborn participants. The current study suggests that postnatal experience is not required for this preference.

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(17)30580-8#secsectitle0015

Kudos to the speaker, as a (physics) layman I found it really well explained. The connection b/w Renormalization flows and phase transition was really elegant. 

bhishma-11

Alas, being slightly over the subtly-warped-judgment line is like taking one drink – sure it only impairs your judgment a little, but, the one of the things you might do with slightly impaired judgment is to take another drink. (Or, say, foster more emotional closeness with someone who you wouldn’t endorse eventually having sex with).

 

This is sort of the situation where you need to erect Shelling fences

One aspect of schooling which is not easily available in home schooling is peer/social learning. Did you find that being a problem? 

In case you're fine with an approximation, you could try modelling the #P problem as a CNF (check this paper for more info) and use an approx model counter such as https://github.com/meelgroup/approxmc

Answer by bhishma80
"Trial of Socrates" - Socrates preferring death instead of changing his stance on "corrupting the youth"
Kind of cliched, but still I really love this pic.

Ahh that's because in India we have a graduate entrance exam called GATE (for admission to IITs and other institutes). And ToC carries a lot of weight-age.

bhishma*50

I found Introduction to Automata theory by Ullman on EdX to be extremely useful. It covers most of the basics and there's also a book by the same author. Apart from the lectures you also get access to high quality assignments, problem sets which I think are very essential for a course like ToC.

Answer by bhishma*120

Yeah even I used to feel the same, Wigner wrote an article about it "The unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences" you will definitely find it useful.