All of segfault 's Comments + Replies

segfault -4-1

I deem the user "Conor Moreton" sus.

[+]segfault -19-18
2phasing
Not only did the person in question end the relationship and safeword you, but per the recording you posted in several places of you talking with the Stanford sheriffs, she herself reported you to Stanford police. You showed up to her dorm shirtless banging on furniture. She did not want to see you. You showed up 5 more times, the last time with a knife and were banned from Stanford campus. You have more than enough evidence that this person, who ended things, who safeworded you, who blocked you on every single platform, who reported you to the police, does not want anything to do with you, yet you continue to harass her. Your "understanding" of consent is terrifying and wrong. Your behavior shows that your delusions are so strong that it seems no amount of evidence will break past them. You are not willing to be wrong. I hope for the safety of the women who have been in your life, and for your own wellbeing, that you submit to the advice every one who has cared about you in the past is giving you, and seek intensive care.
[+]segfault -11-3

(Disambiguation: not the originally linked tweet thread, but the inciting incident that caused the originally linked tweet thread to be written.)

5Conor Moreton
Are you seriously pretending that you don't know how to look at a tweet in an incognito window?  You seem to have been expertly doing so in, uh, "other cases".

I'll hopefully get to this later tonight. Thanks 🙏 

6mortgenson
I like to think I’m a pretty decent judge of character and fairly impartial. Actually, let me be honest. I was not partial. In your favor. I have no idea who the fuck Duncan Sabien is. I guess some celeb in this space? Even if this post without the comments were the only thing I’d read, I’d still come away with the same take.

What is most troubling to me is not anything that Duncan or anyone else has said, but the stuff that you have said in the apparent belief that other people would say, "Oh, yeah, that's completely exculpatory." 

I wanted very badly to believe that this was a huge misunderstanding but your own beliefs and behaviors, stated in your own words, are concerning to me. 

5Conor Moreton
You have not shown a single claim in the warning doc to be false.  Your "defense" is Trumpian, basically—just keep loudly declaring "fake news" and hope that nobody notices you provide zero evidence in service of your claims while there is a preponderance of evidence on the other side.
5Belac Hillcrest
>> And they get blocked or yelled at every single time. > Patently false. Has there been a time recently where someone offered you feedback, and you changed your behavior? 

How does dropping off covid tests lead to Ruchika calling the police on you? It feels like I'm missing something here. 

5Conor Moreton
Okay. Then given all those years of participation, you should have little trouble naming a couple of known-and-acknowledged rationalists or EAs who know you and will say "yeah, this guy is one of us."

Someone's resolving comments that they shouldn't be. I have to revoke permissions. This is so annoying. Got a better idea?

4Callmesalticidae
It would take a bit more work, but inserting your comments and giving them particular formatting (e.g. fully indented as a single block + red color) would probably do the trick. 
anled1514

You said in another thread that your IRL friends have not asked you clarifying questions about what's going on. This style of response might be why. You were asked why you sent this message, and instead of answering the question, or even denying its premise directly, you threw an evidence-free smokebomb. If you want people in your life to ask questions and give you feedback, you have to show them you will answer questions directly and honestly, show them you'll take critical feedback well. Otherwise, they'll quickly decide to just avoid you.

mortgenson2812

I recognize they are anonymous but I am capable of using inferences, textual clues, and context to make a reasonable guess. Can you affirmatively say “I did not write that message”? That’s literally all I care about here.

6mortgenson
This one after Duncan blocked you.
-5segfault
segfault -30

(the answer, for my local friends, is ZERO.)

I feel like you’re not hearing me. I haven’t heard things through the grapevine. I’ve read the full Google doc from Duncan and your recent social media posts. I feel like I have just about all of the context I could possibly have. Do you think it is absolutely impossible someone could read the Facebook messages and conclude that you are in the wrong here? Which is more likely, that there is a massive conspiracy against you or that people genuinely disagree?

ask questions

People have! Like “klob you seem like you’re making a lot of major life decisions re... (read more)

-3segfault
(the answer, for my local friends, is ZERO.)
-3Conor Moreton
You are not a part of this community.
6mortgenson
What explanation do you have for the adnonymous message about Duncan’s children?

As I do with most people that I might want to be friends with, because I care about my own safety and that of the people I have over.

... and then you falsely accuse them in public of things which they are completely innocent of, and refuse to retract or apologize.

(And before you DARVO, the difference between that and what's happening to you here is that here, the evidence shows you to be undeniably in the wrong.)

-8segfault
8Conor Moreton
No, but these things are: "Thank you, Duncan. I honestly think you’ve changed my life." "Miss you. Virtually." (after being blocked) "You're one of the best people I know." (contrast with the present-day "we don't know each other at all, wtf") ~"I'd gladly send you $200 if it meant you could get a babysitter and come to my drug/sex/music party." And this:

Access fixed - anyone with the link should now be able to both see comments & comment, too. Thanks for informing me.

1segfault
Someone's resolving comments that they shouldn't be. I have to revoke permissions. This is so annoying. Got a better idea?

Could you define what you mean here by counterfactual impact?

My knowledge of the word counterfactual comes mainly from the blockchain world, where we use it in the form of "a person could do x at any time, and we wouldn't be able to stop them, therefore x is counterfactually already true or has counterfactually already occured"

-14segfault
5ChristianKl
Counterfactual means, that if something would not have happened something else would have happened. It's a key concept in Judea Pearl's work on causality. 

Please excuse my lack of knowledge here, but if we know all of the vectors for the tokens in the cl100k_base model, why can't we then create the embedding matrix? Is the embedding matrix not simply all of these rows?

1Martin Fell
The tokens themselves are public, but not the actual embedding matrix/vectors (as far as I know)