Hey I know you posted this a long time ago but I found this a few weeks on tvtropes and found it very clever.
But the ending confuses me, so I'm hoping you'll reply to my message:
Are we supposed to agree with the antagonist? When I first read it I thought "ahah I get it, its about people blindly accepting whats put in front of them, so Hiro representing that blindly accepted what he said about remaking the world and we're supposed to think about it and realise he was too gullible" then reading some of the comments made me wonder if he was supposed to be right.
That disturbed, but then I wondered, if one had god like power would it be a good idea to try to remake the world or would their be too great a risk of people **Ing it up?
Hey I know you posted this a long time ago but I found this a few weeks on tvtropes and found it very clever. But the ending confuses me, so I'm hoping you'll reply to my message:
Are we supposed to agree with the antagonist? When I first read it I thought "ahah I get it, its about people blindly accepting whats put in front of them, so Hiro representing that blindly accepted what he said about remaking the world and we're supposed to think about it and realise he was too gullible" then reading some of the comments made me wonder if he was supposed to be right.
That disturbed, but then I wondered, if one had god like power would it be a good idea to try to remake the world or would their be too great a risk of people **Ing it up?