lessdazed comments on Rationality Quotes October 2011 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: MinibearRex 03 October 2011 06:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (532)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lessdazed 22 October 2011 01:18:10PM *  4 points [-]

That could have used anonymity.

If other people think political ideology is highly relevant to status, doesn't that make it probably at least somewhat so?

Comment author: [deleted] 22 October 2011 01:51:02PM *  1 point [-]

I was actually searching for your thread, but didn't find it among articles tagged by quotes. I would have used it if it was so.

If other people think political ideology is highly relevant to status, doesn't that make it probably at least somewhat so?

Some pretty low status people have been quoted in rationality threads in the past, including people with really odious ideologies. Are downvoters convinced that Roissy is even lower status than those individuals or are they rather concerned that since Roissy (as the blog was back in 2007-2009) was read by quite a few members of the OB/LW community (including Robin Hanson who still links to him)!

Basically is this a fear that while Roissy's beliefs pay rent in anticipated experience they are evil (as in espousing different values) and thus shouldn't be allowed to influence fellow LWers who are clearly not good enough thinkers to handle this?

If this is so this may be a confirmation of Vladimir_M's take on the state of gender related debates on LW.

Or it could just be a bad quote.

Comment author: wedrifid 22 October 2011 03:59:22PM 6 points [-]

Some pretty low satus people have been quoted in rationality threads in the past, including people with really odious ideologies. Are downvoters convinced that Roissy is even lower status than those individuals or are they rather concerned that since Roissy (as the blog was back in 2007-2009) was read by quite a few members of the OB/LW community (including Robin Hanson who still links to him)!

It isn't low status as much as it is "out group". Low status doesn't warrant that kind of attention.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 October 2011 08:19:24AM *  1 point [-]

Posters like dedalus2u (if I recall this right) have argued that out group is basically just lowest possible status.

Comment author: wedrifid 23 October 2011 08:28:31AM *  4 points [-]

I disagree with posters like dedalus2u. Practically speaking I would far prefer to be the out-group villain that people desperately try to lower in status than the person that actually has low status within the group who gets treated with utter indifference.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 October 2011 10:33:14AM 2 points [-]

I think I agree.

Comment author: wedrifid 23 October 2011 10:39:00AM 4 points [-]

So, I am sure, would that Roissy fellow. :)