Douglas_Knight comments on [minor] Separate Upvotes and Downvotes Implimented - Less Wrong

29 Post author: Larks 29 January 2013 10:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Error 29 January 2013 06:51:44PM 2 points [-]

Woot.

A thought: Now one might be able to find the most-controversial LW posts, (measured as max(up+down-abs(up-down), perhaps) in the same manner that Top gives us the most-popular. It might be interesting to see empirically what topics LW treats as controversial.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 29 January 2013 08:17:29PM *  2 points [-]

It has always been explicitly possible to sort comments by controversy by clicking on "sort by." I believe that in the beginning there was a link to sort posts by controversy (discussion). At some point the link was removed, but the URL kept working. At some point I recall someone discovering it and people being suspicious that the sorting was buggy. But currently it lists posts that have received lots of upvotes and lots of downvotes. Added: read the rest of this thread for more detail about these links.

I haven't figured out what the definition of controversial is. There used to be a paragraph here speculating about it. I previously linked to the open thread, which was not a good example to exhibit sorting. The politics thread contains actually controversial comments and thus sorting actually does something.

Comment author: [deleted] 29 January 2013 10:43:24PM 1 point [-]

As of now, the controversial posts page includes quite a few posts with 100% positive karma.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 29 January 2013 11:45:44PM *  0 points [-]

Thanks for the correction.

By default, it only lists the past three months of posts, which weren't very controversial. Under the current system, controversial posts probably get demoted to discussion. So long ago that I forgot, I had turned off that filter and so I saw a list of posts from before the current system with scores close to 0 that had received about 50 votes total. I saw the same on discussion. The three month filter for discussion does have scores close to zero, but usually not quite so many votes.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 January 2013 12:32:02PM 0 points [-]

Thanks; I hadn't noticed the filter. When I set it to “All time” it does show posts I'd expect to get both lots of upvotes and lots of downvotes.