moral_dilemma comments on Open Thread, July 1-15, 2013 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Vaniver 01 July 2013 05:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (342)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: moral_dilemma 02 July 2013 08:15:51AM 2 points [-]

What can possibly be unethical about it?

It creates a child who will not be raised by their biological father.

since you might be legally on the hook for child support.

Unlikely in this context, since they are much wealthier than I. I doubt they would want to share custody with me in exchange for my pittance of a salary.

Comment author: ChristianKl 02 July 2013 01:02:38PM 5 points [-]

Unlikely in this context, since they are much wealthier than I. I doubt they would want to share custody with me in exchange for my pittance of a salary.

They might die and the child has still rights against you.

Comment author: falenas108 02 July 2013 12:39:38PM 8 points [-]

It creates a child who will not be raised by their biological father.

What's the specific problem this would cause?

Comment author: drethelin 02 July 2013 05:07:04PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: falenas108 02 July 2013 05:20:51PM 4 points [-]

Questions about the validity of the Cinderella effect aside, the OP knows the couple and can probably make a more informed judgement about this.

Of course, you can't tell this perfectly. But if the OP is anything more than casual acquaintances with the couple, I would say specific evidence probably overpowers the general case.

Comment author: maia 03 July 2013 01:56:06AM 1 point [-]

Has this been demonstrated in adoptive parents, though? Having only adopted children seems as though it might bias things in a different direction.