1 min read

3

This is a special post for quick takes by TheManxLoiner. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
4 comments, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Should LessWrong have an anonymous mode? When reading a post or comments, is it useful to have the username or does that introduce bias?

I had this thought after reading this review of LessWrong: https://nathanpmyoung.substack.com/p/lesswrong-expectations-vs-reality

I vote no.  An option for READERS to hid the names of posters/commenters might be nice, but an option to post something that you're unwilling to have a name on (not even your real name, just a tag with some history and karma) does not improve things.

[-]jbash120

There is an option for readers to hide names. It's in the account preferences. The names don't show up unless you roll over them. I use it, to supplement my long-cultivated habit of always trying to read the content before the author name on every site[1].

As for anonymous posts, I don't agree with your blanket dismissal. I've seen them work against groupthink on some forums (while often at the same time increasing the number of low-value posts you have to wade through). Admittedly Less Wrong doesn't seem to have too much of a groupthink problem[2]. Anyway, there could always be an option for readers to hide anonymous posts.


  1. Actually I'm not sure I had to cultivate it. Back in the days of Usenet, I had to learn to actually ever look at poster's names to begin with. I do not think that I am normal in this. ↩︎

  2. ... which actually surprises me because at least some people do seem to buy into the "karma" gamification. ↩︎