Comment Permalink

Of course the choice of what sort of model we fit to our data can sometimes preordain the conclusion.

Another way to interpret this is there was a very steep update made by the community in early 2022, and since then it’s been relatively flat, or perhaps trending down slowly with a lot of noise (whereas before the update it was trending up slowly).

See in context

29 Metaculus Predicts Weak AGI in 2 Years and AGI in 10

by Chris_Leong

24th Mar 2023

1 min read

29

Just a quick update on predicted timelines. Obviously, there’s no guarantee that Metaculus is 100% reliable + you should look at other sources as well, but I find this concerning.

Weak AGI is now predicted in a little over two years:

https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/date-weakly-general-ai-is-publicly-known/

AGI predicted in about 10: https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5121/date-of-artificial-general-intelligence/

Also, these are predicted dates until these systems publicly known, not the date until they exist. Things are getting crazy.

Even though Eliezer claims that there was no fire alarm for AGI, perhaps this is the fire alarm?

Forecasts (Specific Predictions)AI TimelinesAI

Personal Blog

29

Metaculus Predicts Weak AGI in 2 Years and AGI in 10

New Comment

14 comments, sorted by

top scoring

Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 2:34 PM

[-]Gabe M2y*289

Here's a plot of the Metaculus Strong AGI predictions over time (code by Rylan Schaeffer). The x-axis is the data of the prediction, the y-axis is the predicted year of strong AGI at the time. The blue line is a linear fit. The red dashed line is a y = x line.

Interestingly, it seems these predictions have been dropping by 5.5 predicted years per real year which seems much faster than I imagined. If we extrapolate out and look at where the blue regression intersects the red y = x line (so assuming similar updating in the future, when we might expect the updated time to be the same as the time of prediction), we get 2025.77 (October 9, 2025) for AGI.

Edit: Re-pulled the Metaculus data which slightly changed the regression (m=-6.5 -> -5.5) and intersection (2025.44 -> 2025.77).

[-]gwern2y72

There's a striking inverted V-shape there (which would be even clearer if you fit a segmented regression with 1 break point), where it's drifting up for all of 2021, only to suddenly reverse and drop over like a stone 2022-2023.

What's the qualitative characterization of Metaculus collective views there? At least from my perspective, 2021 seemed in line with scaling expectations with tons of important DL research demonstrating the scaling hypothesis & blessings of scale. I don't remember anything that would've been pivotal around what looks like a breakpoint Dec 2021 - if it had happened around or after Feb 2022, then you could point to Chinchilla / Gato / PaLM / Flamingo / DALL-E 2, but why Dec 2021?

[-]Gabe M2y*70

Good idea. Here's just considering the predictions starting in 2022 and on. Then, you get a prediction update rate of 16 years per year.

[-]dsj2y10

Of course the choice of what sort of model we fit to our data can sometimes preordain the conclusion.

[-]dsj2y21

Seems to me there's too much noise to pinpoint the break at a specific month. There are some predictions made in early 2022 with an even later date than those made in late 2021.

But one pivotal thing around that time might have been the chain-of-thought stuff which started to come to attention then (even though there was some stuff floating around Twitter earlier).

[-]Ben Pace2y2524

Even though Eliezer claims that there was no fire alarm for AGI, perhaps this is the fire alarm?

I mean, obviously not, as most governments don't know that metaculus exists or what a prediction market is.

[-]Lech Mazur2y20

Here is something more governments might pay attention to: https://today.yougov.com/topics/technology/survey-results/daily/2023/04/03/ad825/3.

46% of U.S. adults are very concerned or somewhat concerned about the possibility that AI will cause the end of the human race on Earth.

[-]Akram Choudhary2y20

What on earth does the government have to do with a fire alarm? The fire alarm continues to buzz even if everyone in the room is deaf. It is just sending a signal not promising any particular action will be taken as a consequence.

[-]Ben Pace2y30

The use of the fire alarm analogy on LessWrong is specifically about its effect, not about it being an epiphenomenon to people's behavior.

[-]AnthonyC2y30

There are many fire alarms, or the people here in this discussion wouldn't know to be worried. There's just no way to know when the last fire alarm is. How often in offices and public spaces do you see everyone just ignore fire alarms because they assume nothing is actually wrong? I see it all the time.

[-]Christopher King2y32

It appears that metaculus' forecasts are not internally consistent

https://www.metaculus.com/questions/9062/time-from-weak-agi-to-superintelligence/

Community Prediction: 42.6 months

[-]Teerth Aloke2y20

Difference in criteria.

[-]Christopher King2y20

Yes, but the criteria still imply that the gap should be ≥ the difference in the other two forecasts.

[-][anonymous]2y3-3

I keep seeing the phrase "if you are going to update update all the way" as an argument against these projection updates.

Basically the argument goes, people should have already expected gpt-3.5 and gpt-4 because those "in the know" 3 years ago used it and knew agi was possible.

For most of us, it was the public release. That crypto scams and AGI news, prior to public access, had the same breathless tone and hype. Direct access is the only way to know the difference between say gpt-4, which works, and IBM Watson, which evidently did not.

So the news we are reacting to is just a few months old.

Moderation Log