So far I’m seeing data that’s strongly in favor of it being easy for me to facilitate rapid growth for many people in this space. But am I missing something here? If you have any ideas please let me know in the comments.
My take:
You can facilitate rapid growth in these areas.
I don't think you're particularly unique in this regard. There are several people who I know (myself included) who can create these sorts of rapid changes on a semi-consistent basis. You named a few as reviewers. There are far more coaches/therapists who are ineffective, but lots of highly effective practitioners who can create rapid change using experiential methods.
@PJ_Eby @Kaj_Sotala @Damon Sasi all come to mind as people on LW who can do this. Having worked with many coaches and therapists, I assure you that many others also have the skill.
Right now I think you're overestimating just how consistent what you do is, and the results focus you're taking is likely creating other negative effects in the psyche that will have to be cleaned up later. It will also mean that if you don't get to the issue in the first session, it will be harder and harder for your work to have an impact over time.
But in general the approach you're taking can and will create rapid results in some people that haven't seen results before.
the results focus you're taking is likely creating other negative effects in the psyche that will have to be cleaned up later
could be, figuring this out
I never give advice. Instead, everything is Socratic Dialogue.
In theorizing why this works, I've come to think of it in terms of inferential distances. The distance between somebody else's net experiences and my own is so vast, that giving advice is futile (and more of an indication that the advice-giver wants to feel self-important).
People are experts on themselves. Given enough space and gentle enough questions from an active listener, they often have the capacity to solve their own problems.
I've come to think of it in terms of inferential distances
yeah probably something like that. I also wrote a little more about this in my blog post today.
People are experts on themselves. Given enough space and gentle enough questions from an active listener, they often have the capacity to solve their own problems.
yeah
it's much higher bandwidth and more efficient too
process the information where it is
I never ask about the past and I never dig into trauma. I focus on what they’re predicting in the present.
^That's what surprised me about Dr. Bessel van der Kolk's book The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. There's not an absolute need to unearth and relive the past---doing so can retraumatize people and make recovery more difficult. (Learning people's stories are so delightful, so I often have to restrain myself from asking prying questions to fulfill my curiosity when I'm intending to help people heal).
Instead, the focus of healing (from many forms of therapy) is more about understanding the present moment and how we relate to it.
Thanks to Kaj Sotala, Stag Lynn, and Ulisse Mini for reviewing. Thanks to Kaj Sotala, Brian Toomey, Alex Zhu, Damon Sasi, Anna Salamon, and CFAR for mentorship and financial support
A few months ago I made the claim “Radically effective and rapid growth [motivationally / emotionally / socially] is possible with the right combination of facilitator and method”. Eg: for anxiety, agency, insecurity, need for validation.
To test my hypothesis, I began a pay-on-results coaching experiment: Pay your bounty if I unblocked your issue.
First bounty
Bob (pseudonymous) and I met at Manifest 2024, where I had set up a table at the night market for hunting “emotional security” bounties.
Bob had lifelong anxiety, and it was crushing his agency and relationships. He offered a $3,000 bounty for resolving it, and I decided to pursue it.
We spoke and tried my method.
It was only necessary for us to talk once, apparently, because a month later he said our one conversation helped him achieve what 8 years of talk therapy could not:
So he paid his bounty when he was ready (in this case, 35 days after the conversation).
I’ve been checking in with him since (latest: last week, two months after the conversation) and he tells me all is well.
Bob also shared some additional benefits beyond his original bounty:
(All shared with permission.)
I’m also hunting many other bounties
[NB: I’ve removed a spreadsheet that was linked here because multiple people misinterpreted it, sorry.]
A woman working in SF after 3 conversations, text support, and three weeks:
An SF founder in his 30s after 1 conversation and two weeks:
(More…)
What the fuck?
“Why does your thing work so unusually well?” asks my mentor Kaj.
For one, it doesn’t work for everyone with every issue, as you can see in the screenshot above. (That said, I suspect a lot of this is my fault for pursuing bounties / people who don’t fit my practice. But I’m getting better at this — I just don’t know how to describe how.)
But why does it work so well for the ones it works for?
I don’t know. I haven't studied other methods, so I wouldn’t know how to compare.
Nonetheless, here are some things I can recall surprised people I’ve helped:
I take inspiration from Predictive Processing: “the brain is a multi-layer prediction machine” (Scott Alexander).
[See Book Review: Surfing Uncertainty | Slate Star Codex and also Multiagent Models of Mind by Kaj Sotala. I summarize what I find helpful about these models in Unconscious Predictions.]
My model: It’s extremely common for people to excessively (and unknowingly!) hold locally optimal mental predictions which are globally suboptimal. Common ones sound like “The only way I can feel okay is if other people like me” and “The only way I can feel good is if I’m productive”.
When predictions like these are safely untangled, people thrive.
I help individuals integrate the predictions they want.
How?
Idk, all we do is talk:
In the ideal case, they absorb my tacit knowledge and learn how to do this without me. Some already have.
Conversations last as long as they need, and we have as many conversations as you need.
Alternative explanations
So far I’m seeing data that’s strongly in favor of it being easy for me to facilitate rapid growth for many people in this space. But am I missing something here? If you have any ideas please let me know in the comments.
Maybe the effect will go away over time and they’ll revert to how they were before?
Plans
I'm hunting at least 7 bounties right now and the median worth is $10,000. I will post future updates on my blog. If you have an issue you’ve been struggling with for years and are willing to place a significant bounty on it, DM me.