Courage can be viewed as a skill.
As you might expect, the military has a strong interest in the development and maintenance of courage. The United States Army is formally of the opinion that courage can be instilled in recruits, and basic training is oriented largely around this problem.
The strategy for courage development used by the Army has three basic factors that stood out to me:
Social reinforcement: Messaging is clear: courage is the expectation; cowardice is evil. Further, cowardice is treachery; to be ruled by fear is to betray your brethren unto death. Finally, historically most casualties are among fleeing soldiers; the causal relationship is that cowardice makes it less likely you will survive.
Incremental challenges: The iconic item here is the obstacle course. The point of an obstacle course is not to test your physical fitness; rather it is to present you with novel physical challenge that you doubt you can do.[1] Then it presents you with another, slightly more intense novel challenge. By the time you've done the course, you have been proven wrong about your limits up to a dozen times. This reduces doubt for all future challenges.
Take the hit: Recruits get gassed. This entails standing in a small concrete building while it is filled with military tear gas, with your mask on. Then you have to take the mask off, and still stand there, breathing in the tear gas. Then they line you up, let everyone out in a flood, and you get to run around in a dirt circle while coughing, puking, crying and everything in your sinuses drain down your face.[2] The exercise has two purposes: one, trust the equipment; two, you will be okay.
In the same vein, there is the ever popular hand-to-hand training, called "combatives." In basic training to reduce injury this must be done from the knees and there is no striking, so it is kind of a goofy grapple. There are always a handful of collegiate wrestlers or jiu-jitsu experts in every group, and further the physical fitness variance is pretty high, which means almost everyone spends some time getting pulverized by someone more skilled and powerful (I was no exception). At the end of the day, you wipe your nose off, and are okay.
The consequences usually aren't as bad as you think they are; this makes them easier to accept up front.
It is worth mentioning that the real focus of military training is a different trick, which is to reduce the relevance of courage as much as possible. You can summarize this as Trigger Action Plans for violence; we spent a lot of time training about what to do in certain situations, so when that situation arises we just do whatever the training says. The result is that even in nominally scary situations fear is irrelevant because we aren't thinking about things, just executing the first thing that comes to mind (which is always training). Even in combat there is virtually no opportunity for cowardice.
You might reasonably wonder what happens to the people who actually can't do the obstacle. The trick is this: they still can, with a little help from their buddies. In every group there are a few who simply can't make progress alone; after the rest of the group goes through, they cycle back to physically help the stragglers over whichever obstacle is stopping them (even if that is all of them). These are not formal instructions, but it always happens anyway. ↩︎
As unpleasant as this sounds, it is usually one of the most fondly remembered events. The central reason for this is that when people from all over the country are subjected to close contact, sleep deprivation, high stress, and unhygienic conditions everyone gets sick - and nothing clears the sinuses like literally clearing all of your sinuses. The days after this event might be the first clear breath you got all month. Also your buddies running blindly into a tree is hilarious. There is always one just off-center of a straight line out the door. Do they do this on purpose? I believe it. ↩︎
I think the archetypal form of courage is courage before physical enemies. Can't say I have it permanently, but a few times in my life I managed to muster it and it feels amazing. But I have no idea how you can deliberately develop it in a safe Western country. The boxing ring gives a diluted experience, because you know there are limits and no real enmity. Things like climbing or public speaking are even more diluted, you can be good at them but turn to jelly when a street situation comes up.
Thanks for the post!
The Zach Weinersmith quote you mentioned goes further, in a direction that might also be relevant:
"...bravery is not cross contextual... Conversely, recklessness *is* cross contextual. Unsafe sex correlates to drug abuse."
I'm pretty reckless in some ways, but need to build courage in other areas.Fostering courage where I need it, turning my recklessness into courage where it's helping me, and minimising it where it isn't, all seem like worthwhile things to try.
This post examines the virtue of courage and explores some practical strategies for becoming more courageous.
Courage (sometimes “bravery” or the closely-related virtue of “valor”) is one of the most frequently mentioned virtues in virtue-oriented traditions. It was one of the four “cardinal virtues” of ancient Greece, for example.
Courage also undergirds other virtues:
Fear and Our Response to It
Courage has to do with our response to risk and fear. This response has at least three components:
Fear is an unpleasant good in the same sort of way that pain and nausea are: Such things are no fun, but they are useful. Fear (when it is operating properly) informs you that you have put yourself in a situation in which you run the risk of harm. The unpleasantness of the sensation of fear prompts you to be averse to doing it again. Fear also can prepare you for an immediate, protective fight-or-flight response.
(Although we are averse to fear, we sometimes also perversely seek it out. Similar to how some people crave the pain of ghost chilies or spankings, some people crave the fright of horror movies and roller-coasters. Is this perhaps a way of helping to regulate our fear response through practice or inoculation?)
The visceral fear response is adaptive and it’s no surprise that we see it in other animals and that it seems to be to some extent a “deep,” subconscious part of our mental make-up. This can also make our fears difficult to work with on a conscious, rational level, as the experiences of people with phobias, panic disorders, anxiety disorders, or post-traumatic stress show.
Must Courage Be Directed toward Worthy Goals?
Many people believe there is a further qualification on courageous acts: they must be goal-directed acts (you are courageous in order to accomplish something, not just to show off your courage, or for the thrill of it, or in quixotic but hopeless defiance, or merely by remaining unruffled) and that goal must be worthwhile.[3] People also tend to consider an act to be more courageous if it is successful.[4]
Is there One Courage or Many?
There are two curiously contrasting scenarios that people commonly describe as courageous:
These are different enough that I wonder if they really describe the same sort of thing. The first describes someone who does something that seems frightful by common consensus, but who is not afraid. The second describes someone who does something that may seem banal to outsiders (holding a tarantula, speaking in public) but has to conquer their fear to do so. Each can be called “courageous” but they seem to exercise different skills.[5]
In much of what I have read from virtue-based traditions, courage is exemplified by the bravery of the warrior in battle. Aristotle, for example, started there and then generalized this to courage in the face of other deliberate human-caused threats, but he was reluctant to go further and say that someone who behaves bravely when threatened with disease or impoverishment was in the same ballpark.[6]
Nowadays we’re more likely to recognize a variety of fears as being things we need courage to confront: fear of rejection, fear of mortality, fear of humiliation, fear of standing out, and so forth. We may speak of the “intellectual courage” it takes to face an inconvenient truth, or the “moral courage” it takes to stand up for what you know is right in the face of social disapproval.[7]
But it may be that when you stretch “courage” to cover so much territory, you no longer describe a single virtue. I noticed this from Zach Weinersmith, who was researching the history of space exploration for his book A City on Mars:
Counterfeit Courages
Rashness
In addition to the more common failure of cowardice, our response to fear can also fail in the opposite direction. There are brain disorders that can disable the ability to feel fear viscerally,[8] throwing you back on mere conscious evaluation. Alcohol use is notorious for inducing temporary YOLO-recklessness and failure to recognize and respond appropriately to danger.
Aristotle for this reason put the courageous “golden mean” at a mid-point between the vice of over-sensitivity to fear (cowardice) and the vice of under-sensitivity (rashness).[6]
Braggadocio
People without real courage often try to fake courage in social situations. As Shakespeare so vividly put it:
Fleeing from a Greater Fear to a Lesser One
Another form of counterfeit courage is exhibited by someone forced to to choose between fearful things—for example, a soldier who goes “bravely” to battle but only because he fears being shot for desertion or being disgraced in his community.
Some motivational “hacks” seem to rely on this sort of thing (e.g. set up a scenario in which if you fail to do some frightening thing, $100 is donated in your name to something you would be horrified to be associated with).
Unfrightening a Situation
Another way to resolve fear side-steps the issue of cowardice or courage by making the fearful situation less fearful. You might, for example, increase your competence: if you have a fear of public speaking, you could participate in Toastmasters, a non-threatening environment in which to practice public speaking skills. As your abilities improve, so does your confidence, and what was fear-inducing no longer is.
This in a way is a form of counterfeit courage (Aristotle said, for example, that in a storm, sailors were not exhibiting more courage than their terrified passengers, but merely a better handle on the situation).[6] On the other hand, this method meets a frightening situation head-on and proves your mastery over it, which strikes me as potentially a helpful way of bolstering courage.
Mere Bravery
If you subscribe to the belief that the virtue of courage is exhibited not by mere bravery, but bravery in the service of worthwhile goals, then other forms of counterfeit courage include foolish courage (bravely doing something not worth the risk) and bad courage (bravely doing something actually harmful).[10]
Becoming Courageous
Physiological, Cognitive, and Behavioral Handles
Zach Weinersmith, in his note above, cited the book Extreme: Why some people thrive at the limits.[11] That book concludes that “We all have a greater capacity to be brave than we sometimes appreciate” and identifies three elements of the fear response—“physiological, cognitive, and behavioral”—each of which has handles we can learn to manipulate in order to take more conscious control over how we respond to fear (and thereby develop more courage):
Consider Courage as a Terminal, not Merely Instrumental, Value
A suggestion from the Aristotelian tradition is that you consider courage a valuable end in itself, not just as something instrumental. In other words, rather than just saying “I wish I were more courageous, for then I could do scary things like X, Y, & Z, which I value” say also “and furthermore I would exhibit courage, which I also value.”
This may improve the motivation you have for being courageous, and increase the pleasure you feel from your courageous acts (and therefore the reinforcing reward you receive).
Insights from Positive Psychology
Christopher Peterson’s and Martin E.P. Seligman’s Character Strengths and Virtues reviews the literature on courage and concludes:
The VIA Institute on Character, associated with Peterson & Seligman, makes the virtue courage out to be a cluster of “strengths”: bravery, honesty (authenticity in particular), perseverance, and zest. Later work in that vein found evidence for the first three, but thought hope and kindness were better than zest at characterizing actions people describe as courageous.[13]
Pop-Psychology / Self-Help Approaches
Peterson & Seligman also summarize the (not particularly well-tested, but intuitively appealing) pop-psychology approaches to improving courage, such as Tony Robbins’s Awaken the Giant Within, in this way:
Strengthen Harmonious Virtues
Other virtues may come to the assistance of courage. For example:
Sometimes it is clear to us when we are being influenced by fear (we tremble as we approach the podium). But other times we may hide from ourselves the fact that we are acting out of fear, perhaps from vanity. Rather than acknowledging that we are frightened, we rationalize our timid behavior in some other way, pretending not to notice that fear has its fingers on the scale of our rationalizations. For this reason, virtues like humility, emotional intelligence, and self-awareness can come to the aid of courage.
What Courageous People Actually Do to Boost Their Courage
Researchers asked subjects to describe a time when they acted courageously, and asked them whether they had done something to augment their courage. 82% said they had, and gave descriptions of the tactics they had used:
The researchers found that different strategies were more typically deployed for different classes of scenarios demanding courage. To evoke physical courage, people were more likely to rely on problem-focused strategies. To evoke psychological courage, emotion-focused strategies. To evoke moral courage, outcome-focused strategies. They suggest that you can use problem-focused strategies to reduce risk, emotion-focused strategies to dampen fear, and outcome-focused strategies to highlight the worthiness of the goal.
Exposure Therapy
Particularly in cases of irrational or exaggerated fear, exposure therapy can help. The frightened person is exposed to the frightful thing—at first in a small, distant, contained way, but later in increasing doses—to learn through direct experience that the thing is harmless or that its harms are tolerable.
Deliberate Fear-Calming Exercises
If circumstances permit and you know how to go about it, you can counteract the physiological symptoms of fear through deliberate exercises of imagining calm scenes, deep breathing, or muscle relaxation.[15]
Anger Distracts You From Fear
Righteous anger—particularly when it is emotionally raw—can both motivate you to overcome your fear, and (albeit irrationally) promote optimism about the results of the actions you plan to take on anger’s behalf, which can make such a response seem less frightening.[16]
Reflect on Your Courageous Acts
Some evidence suggests that you can boost your courage by reflecting on and writing about past occasions in which you faced your fears.[17]
Additional Resources
If you’re fond of audio/visual learning, there are a couple of nice short videos out there: How to stop feeling scared all the time from School of Life, which concerns how to short-circuit excess anxiety, and How to stop being a coward from Academy of Ideas, which is a bit more on the philosophical side.
The Getselfhelp.co.uk site has some worksheets and suggestions you can use if anxiety is causing you to avoid situations that would be beneficial to you. Skills You Need has a page on courage.
C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters (1942), letter ⅩⅩⅨ
Maya Angelou, Meeting Dr. Du Bois (audio interview by Krista Tippett, 2014)
e.g. Douglas N. Walton “The Virtue of Courage” The Recovery of Virtue (1987) p. 602
The assertion that a courageous action must have a good goal is controversial. I tend to think that the courageousness or cowardice of an act or a person is in general orthogonal to the moral worth of the action.
But in popular and much academic use, people resist the idea that, for example, a Nazi soldier’s derring-do qualifies as courage. Bill Maher, on his Politically Incorrect talk show shortly after the 9/11 attacks, pushed back against George W. Bush’s description of the attackers as cowardly, saying:
Maher had to walk that comment back in the face of outrage that led to advertiser boycotts, stations refusing to carry his show, and declining viewership.
If someone endures something frightful for self-interested reasons (e.g. to gain something for themselves), this is less likely to appear as courage—it can be attributed instead to selfish desire outweighing fear. If you do something similar but without any hope of personal gain, this is more likely to be interpreted as courageous. And it is easier to imagine taking such risks in the service of values you consider good. Perhaps this partially explains the intuition that people who do self-sacrificing, frightening things that seem to us to also be bad things must be exhibiting something other than courageousness.
See also C.L.S. Pury, C.B. Starkey, & L.R. Olson “Value of goal predicts accolade courage: more evidence that courage is taking a worthwhile risk” The Journal of Positive Psychology (2024)
Cynthia L.S. Pury & Autumn D. Hensel “Are Courageous Actions Successful Actions?” The Journal of Positive Psychology (2010)
Pury, et al., call the first general courage and the second personal courage.
Cynthia L.S. Pury, Robin M. Kowalski, & Jana Spearman “Distinctions Between General and Personal Courage” The Journal of Positive Psychology (2007)
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics Ⅲ.6
See, for example, Rushworth M. Kidder, Moral Courage (2006)
Another variety, dubbed “vital courage” by Deborah Finfgeld, concerns people who display courage in the face of serious illness or personal hardship. [D. Finfgeld “Becoming and being courageous in the chronically ill elderly” Issues in Mental Health Nursing (1995); D. Finfgeld “Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle” Qualitative Health Research (1999)] This perhaps shades into perseverance.
Cynthia L.S. Pury, et al. (“Courage, Courageous Acts, and Positive Psychology” Positive Psychology: Established and Emerging Issues 2017 p. 159), identify some more varieties, and suggest “that the best way to understand these distinctions is to look at the specific goals and risks involved. Because these goal–risk pairs commonly co-occur in nature, we speculate, society and researchers have labeled different types of courage.”
See, for example, Marissa Fessenden, “This Woman Can’t Feel Fear” Smithsonian, 21 January 2015
William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice (Bassanio speaking, Act 3, Scene 2)
Pury, et al. (2017) p. 161
Emma Barrett and Paul Martin, Extreme: Why some people thrive at the limits (2014)
Christopher Peterson & Martin E.P. Seligman, Character Strengths and Virtues (2004), pp. 221, 226
Cynthia L.S. Pury & Robin M. Kowalski “Human Strengths, Courageous Actions, and General and Personal Courage” Journal of Positive Psychology (2007)
Cynthia L.S. Pury “Can Courage Be Learned” Positive Psychology: Exploring the Best in People v. 1 (2008) pp. 118–119, describing Pury et al. “Getting up the nerve: Self-reports of deliberate attempts to increase courage” (2006)
Pury (2008) pp. 123–124, citing J. Wolpe Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition (1958)
Jennifer S. Lerner & Larissa Z. Tiedens “Portrait of the Angry Decision Maker: Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger’s Influence on Cognition” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (2006)
Pury (2008) p. 124
Anna Halmburger, Anna Baumert, & Manfred Schmitt “Anger as driving factor of moral courage in comparison with guilt and global mood: A multimethod approach” European Journal of Social Psycholovy (2014)
Amanda Kramer & Richard Zinbarg “Recalling courage: An initial test of a brief writing intervention to activate a ‘courageous mindset’ and courageous behavior” The Journal of Positive Psychology (2018)