Mental Health and the Alignment Problem: A Compilation of Resources (updated April 2023)
This is a post about mental health and disposition in relation to the alignment problem. It compiles a number of resources that address how to maintain wellbeing and direction when confronted with existential risk. Many people in this community have posted their emotional strategies for facing Doom after Eliezer Yudkowsky’s “Death With Dignity” generated so much conversation on the subject. This post intends to be more touchy-feely, dealing more directly with emotional landscapes than questions of timelines or probabilities of success. The resources section would benefit from community additions. Please suggest any resources that you would like to see added to this post. Please note that this document is not intended to replace professional medical or psychological help in any way. Many preexisting mental health conditions can be exacerbated by these conversations. If you are concerned that you may be experiencing a mental health crisis, please consult a professional. Preface to the 2nd Edition This post was released in April 2022 under the same title. This April 2023 update features new resources in every section, with a particular emphasis on the Alignment Positions and People Resources sections. Within each section, resources have been thematically categorized for easier access. Following the large capabilities leaps in the past year, these resources seem more important than ever. If you have suggestions for improving this post, for making it more accessible, or for new resources to add, please leave a comment or reach out to either Chris Scammell or DivineMango. We hope you are all well and that you find this update helpful. Introduction There is no right way to emotionally respond to the reality of approaching superintelligent AI, our collective responsibility to align it with our values, or the fact that we might not succeed. As transformative AI approaches, we must ensure that we have the tools and resources to be okay. Here, the valence of “be ok
Thanks for trying to model it a bit more mechanistically. I think you're right that unfolding leans receptive & bottom-up, while thinking leans active & top-down.
But there's a bit more in what I'm trying to bake into "unfolding":
- Unfolding requires both bottom-up and top-down work. e.g. I am choosing to look at this specific area of my life right now (top down), but once tuned into it, I drop the narrative and notice what is actually there (bottom up)
- The mechanism that distinguishes real unfolding from random mental drift is salience/felt-sense. In addition to "let disconnected patterns surface" there's also "notice where there's emotional charge/tightness/aliveness, and investigate THAT specifically."
- The telic dimension of unfolding is
... (read more)