You don't need an additional ontological entity to reflect a judgment (and judgments can differ between different people or agents). You don't need special angry atoms to form an angry person, that property can be either in the pattern of how the atoms are arranged, or in the way you perceive their arrangement. See these posts:

• http://lesswrong.com/lw/oi/mind_projection_fallacy/
• http://lesswrong.com/lw/oj/probability_is_in_the_mind/
• http://lesswrong.com/lw/ro/2place_and_1place_words/
• http://lesswrong.com/lw/oo/explaining_vs_explaining_away/
• http://lesswrong.com/lw/p3/angry_atoms/